On 6/7/07, Rafael Rossini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Jeff and Mike.
Would you mind telling us about the architecture of your solutions a
little bit? Mike, you said that you implemented a highly-distributed
search
engine using Solr as indexing nodes. What does that mean? You guys
implemen
Hi, Jeff and Mike.
Would you mind telling us about the architecture of your solutions a
little bit? Mike, you said that you implemented a highly-distributed search
engine using Solr as indexing nodes. What does that mean? You guys
implemented a master, multi-slave solution for replication? Or t
Mike - thanks for the comments. Some responses added below.
On 6/7/07, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've implemented a highly-distributed search engine using Solr (200m
docs and growing, 60+ servers). It is not a Solr-based solution in
the vein of FederatedSearch--it is a higher-le
On 6-Jun-07, at 7:44 PM, Jeff Rodenburg wrote:
I've been exploring distributed search, as of late. I don't know
about the
"next solr" but I could certainly see a "distributed solr" grow out
of such
an expansion.
I've implemented a highly-distributed search engine using Solr (200m
docs a
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 6/6/07, Jeff Rodenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In terms of the FederatedSearch wiki entry (updated last year), has
there
been any progress made this year on this topic, at least something
worthy of
being added or updated to the wiki page?
Priorities shifted, and I d
On 6/6/07, Jeff Rodenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In terms of the FederatedSearch wiki entry (updated last year), has there
been any progress made this year on this topic, at least something worthy of
being added or updated to the wiki page?
Priorities shifted, and I dropped it for a while.
2007/6/7, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 6/6/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> anyone agree?
No ;-)
At least not if you mean using map-reduce for queries.
When I started looking at distributed search, I immediately went and
read the map-reduce paper (easier concept than it firs
I've been exploring distributed search, as of late. I don't know about the
"next solr" but I could certainly see a "distributed solr" grow out of such
an expansion.
In terms of the FederatedSearch wiki entry (updated last year), has there
been any progress made this year on this topic, at least
On 6/6/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
anyone agree?
No ;-)
At least not if you mean using map-reduce for queries.
When I started looking at distributed search, I immediately went and
read the map-reduce paper (easier concept than it first appeared), and
realized it's really more for
anyone agree?
Next solr's development 's plan is? anyone know?
--
regards
jl
10 matches
Mail list logo
