> Use smaller caches unless you need bigger ones for some reason.
>
> class="solr.search.LRUCache"
> size="65536"
> initialSize="16384"
> autowarmCount="16384"/>
>
> If you aren't faceting, I'd make this smaller.
I'm faceting quite heavily... My plan is to give the user a ta
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Bram de Jong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Erick Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> But are you sure you're not just masking the problem? That is, your limit
>> may now be 90,000 queries...
>>
>> I always assume this kind of thing
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Erick Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But are you sure you're not just masking the problem? That is, your limit
> may now be 90,000 queries...
>
> I always assume this kind of thing is a memory leak somewhere, have you
> any tools to monitor your memory consum
But are you sure you're not just masking the problem? That is, your limit
may now be 90,000 queries...
I always assume this kind of thing is a memory leak somewhere, have you
any tools to monitor your memory consumption and see if that's ever-rising?
Best
Erick
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:38 AM, B
Ai! That was exactly it. I increased the VM mem, and all is running
fine (34K queries and rising!)!
Thanks a lot,
- Bram
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe you jetty need to turning
> how many memory in your system ?
> Can you show the processes informa
Maybe you jetty need to turning
how many memory in your system ?
Can you show the processes information with the java processes ?
above
Chris
2008/6/2 Bram de Jong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello all,
>
>
> Still running tests on solr using the example jetty container. I've
> been g
Hello all,
Still running tests on solr using the example jetty container. I've
been getting nice performance. However, suddenly between 15400 and
15600 queries, I get a very serious drop in performance, and this
every time I run my test, independent of what I'm searching for. The
performance STAY
