e results:
831
*:*
class_name:License
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/slow-performance-on-simple-filter-tp4135613p4140728.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 8:47 AM, mizayah wrote:
> i show you my full query
>
> it's rly simple one
> q=*:* and fq=class_name:CdnFile
>
> debug q shows that process of q takes so long.
> single filter is critical here.
400ms is too long... something is strange.
One possibility is that the part of
421.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
420.0
415.0
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/slow-performance-on-simple-filter-tp4135613p4139050.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Wednesday, May 14, 2014 4:41 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: slow performance on simple filter
Hey,
I got pretty big index with about 7 mln doccuments.
I got pretty slow query when i ask about common word. Nothing changes when i
ask by q or fq.
params={fl=score,class_name&indent
PS.
> I index only this field into elasticsearch and im getting same responses
> like in 0,08s
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/slow-performance-on-simple-filter-tp4135613.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
g same responses
> like in 0,08s
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/slow-performance-on-simple-filter-tp4135613.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/slow-performance-on-simple-filter-tp4135613.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
