Re: slave index is bigger than master index

2010-07-29 Thread Peter Karich
Hi Muneeb, I fear you'll have no chance: replicating an index will use more disc space on the slave nodes. Of course, you could minimize disc usage AFTER the replication via the 'optimize-hack'. But are you sure the reason for the slave-node die, is due to disc limitations? Try to observe the sla

Re: slave index is bigger than master index

2010-07-29 Thread Muneeb Ali
Where do these lines go in solr config? 5000 1 Thanks, -Mueeb -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/slave-index-is-bigger-than-master-index-tp996329p1003903.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: slave index is bigger than master index

2010-07-29 Thread Muneeb Ali
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/slave-index-is-bigger-than-master-index-tp996329p1003902.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: slave index is bigger than master index

2010-07-28 Thread Muneeb Ali
066.n3.nabble.com/slave-index-is-bigger-than-master-index-tp996329p1002432.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: slave index is bigger than master index

2010-07-28 Thread Muneeb Ali
ntext: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/slave-index-is-bigger-than-master-index-tp996329p1002426.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: slave index is bigger than master index

2010-07-27 Thread Lance Norskog
Ah! You have junk files piling up in the slave index directory. When this happens, you may have to remove data/index entirely. I'm not sure if Solr replication will handle that, or if you have to copy the whole index to reset it. You said the slaves time out- maybe the files are so large that the

Re: slave index is bigger than master index

2010-07-27 Thread Peter Karich
> We have three dedicated servers for solr, two for slaves and one for master, > all with linux/debian packages installed. > > I understand that replication does always copies over the index in an exact > form as in master index directory (or it is supposed to do that at least), > and if the mast

Re: slave index is bigger than master index

2010-07-27 Thread Muneeb Ali
t the live search, while playing with slave nodes' indices. We will be running the indexing on master node today over the night. Lets see if it does it again. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/slave-index-is-bigger-than-master-index-tp996329p998750.html Sen

Re: slave index is bigger than master index

2010-07-26 Thread Chris Hostetter
: No I didn't. I thought you aren't supposed to run optimize on slaves. Well correct, you should make all changes to the master. : but it doesn;t matter now, as I think its fixed now. I just added a dummy : document on master, ran a commit call and then once that executed ran an : optimize call.

RE: slave index is bigger than master index

2010-07-26 Thread Bastian Spitzer
? maybe worth a try.. good luck -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Peter Karich [mailto:peat...@yahoo.de] Gesendet: Montag, 26. Juli 2010 16:54 An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Betreff: Re: slave index is bigger than master index did you try an optimize on the slave too? > Yes I always run

Re: slave index is bigger than master index

2010-07-26 Thread Muneeb Ali
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/slave-index-is-bigger-than-master-index-tp996329p996611.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: slave index is bigger than master index

2010-07-26 Thread Peter Karich
did you try an optimize on the slave too? > Yes I always run an optimize whenever I index on master. In fact I just ran > an optimize command an hour ago, but it didn't make any difference. >

Re: slave index is bigger than master index

2010-07-26 Thread Muneeb Ali
I just checked my config file, and I do have exact same values for deletionPolicy tag, as you attached in your email, so I dont really think it could be this. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/slave-index-is-bigger-than-master-index-tp996329p996373.html Sent

Re: AW: slave index is bigger than master index

2010-07-26 Thread Muneeb Ali
Yes I always run an optimize whenever I index on master. In fact I just ran an optimize command an hour ago, but it didn't make any difference. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/slave-index-is-bigger-than-master-index-tp996329p996364.html Sent from the

AW: slave index is bigger than master index

2010-07-26 Thread Bastian Spitzer
] Gesendet: Montag, 26. Juli 2010 15:37 An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Betreff: slave index is bigger than master index Hi, I am using Solr 1.4 version, with master-slave setup. We have one master slave and two slave servers. It was all working fine, but lately solr slaves are behaving strange

Re: slave index is bigger than master index

2010-07-26 Thread Tommaso Teofili
> > Any help would be highly appreciated. > > Thanks very much. > > -Muneeb > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/slave-index-is-bigger-than-master-index-tp996329p996329.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

slave index is bigger than master index

2010-07-26 Thread Muneeb Ali
://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/slave-index-is-bigger-than-master-index-tp996329p996329.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.