Re: shard connection timeout

2012-07-23 Thread Trym R. Møller
during gc and occurred connection refused error. Our gc option is -XX:+UseParallelGC -XX:+UseParallelOldGC -XX:+AggressiveOpts Response waiting is better than connection refuse for us. is there any solution? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/shard-connection

Re: shard connection timeout

2012-07-13 Thread Erick Erickson
y allocation. >> But we are servicing patent search and that is accepted very complex queries >> used memory. >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/shard-connection-timeout-tp3994301p3994556.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: shard connection timeout

2012-07-12 Thread Michael Della Bitta
and that is accepted very complex queries > used memory. > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/shard-connection-timeout-tp3994301p3994556.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: shard connection timeout

2012-07-11 Thread Jason
.nabble.com/shard-connection-timeout-tp3994301p3994556.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: shard connection timeout

2012-07-11 Thread Erick Erickson
c option is -XX:+UseParallelGC -XX:+UseParallelOldGC > -XX:+AggressiveOpts > Response waiting is better than connection refuse for us. > is there any solution? > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/shard-connection-timeout-tp3994301p3994

Re: shard connection timeout

2012-07-10 Thread Jason
better than connection refuse for us. is there any solution? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/shard-connection-timeout-tp3994301p3994320.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.