: I effectively need to use a multiplication in the sorting of the items.
: Something like score*popularity.
: It seems the only way to do this is to use a bf parameter.
: However how do you use bf in combination with the standard requestHandler?
functions are understood by the standard query par
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 2:55 Joe
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: FW: Score customization
I effectively need to use a multiplication in the sorting of the items.
Something like score*popularity.
It seems the only way to do this is to use a bf parameter.
However how do
the score just like any
> other clause ... if you sort by score, you are sorting by the *whole*
> score ... if you sort by some other field then the *whole* score is
> irrelevant.
>
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Score-cus
On Nov 15, 2007 11:06 AM, Jae Joo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for the way to get the score - only hundredth - ex.
> 4.09something like that.
> Currently, it has 7 decimal digits. 1.8032384
If you want to display scores only to the hundredths place, simply do
that in your client.
Ther
Hi,
I am looking for the way to get the score - only hundredth - ex.
4.09something like that.
Currently, it has 7 decimal digits. 1.8032384
Thanks,
Jae
: Now I need to know whether the FunctionQuery result is considered during
: the results sorting. That is, are search results sorted according to the
: sum of the similarity and the FunctionQuery value or according to
: similarity only?
a function query in a larger query contributes to the sco
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Yonik Seeley
Sent: Sat 11/3/2007 11:21 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: FW: Score customization
On 11/3/07, Victoria Kaganski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess I was not clear... I understand that if I use FunctionQuery, it's
>
and let us know if you don't get what
you expect.
-Yonik
>
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Yonik Seeley
> Sent: Wed 10/31/2007 7:21 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: FW: Score customization
>
>
>
> On
-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: FW: Score customization
On 10/31/07, Victoria Kaganski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does FunctionQuery actually override the default similarity function? If
> it does, how can I still access the similarity value?
FunctionQuery returns the *value* of a field (or
On 10/31/07, Victoria Kaganski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does FunctionQuery actually override the default similarity function? If
> it does, how can I still access the similarity value?
FunctionQuery returns the *value* of a field (or a function of it) as
the value for a query - it does not use
Subject: Re: Score customization
Victoria,
Either use FunctionQuery's or hack around HitCollector.collect(int,
float) in SolrIndexSearcher...and adjust the score using the additional
values you mentioned.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Me
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 4:42 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Score customization
Victoria,
Either use FunctionQuery's or hack around HitCollector.collect(int,
float) in SolrIndexSearcher...and adjust the score using the additional
value
anski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 7:19:46 AM
Subject: Score customization
Hi!
My system uses solr to build a searchable archive of documents. I need
to override the default scoring/similarity function because the
additional to the quer
Hi!
My system uses solr to build a searchable archive of documents. I need
to override the default scoring/similarity function because the
additional to the query relevancy factors have to be considered. For
example, each document has "updated on" and "source" fields, which
should influence the sco
14 matches
Mail list logo
