: of official documentation, but I wonder abstractly how a non-committer then
: should contribute to the documentation. I just did an evaluation of
...
: With current technology, possibilities include:
you pretty much nailed it...
: * Make a comment within Confluence suggesting content
Hoss et. al,
I'm not intending on contributing documentation in any immediate sense (the
disclaimer), but I thank you all for the clarification.
It makes some sense to require a committer to review each suggested piece
of official documentation, but I wonder abstractly how a non-committer then
sh
: Because they have different potential authors, the two systems now serve
: different purposes.
:
: There are still some pages on the MoinMoin wiki that contain
: documentation that should be in the reference guide, but isn't.
:
: The MoinMoin wiki is still useful, as a place where users can co
On 1/30/2015 10:59 PM, Dan Davis wrote:
> I've been thinking of https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ as the "Old Wiki" and
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr as the "New Wiki".
>
> I guess that's the wrong way to think about it - Confluence is being used
> for the "Solr Reference Guide",
Hi Dan,
I would say that the wiki is old and dated and that gap is only increasing.
I would highly recommend everyone to use the Reference Guide instead of the
wiki, unless there's something that they can't find. In case you are unable
to find something on the wiki, it'd be good to comment on conf
I've been thinking of https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ as the "Old Wiki" and
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr as the "New Wiki".
I guess that's the wrong way to think about it - Confluence is being used
for the "Solr Reference Guide", and MoinMoin is being used as a wiki.
Is this the
