: I will eventually get around to implementing it myself, at least in a
: pragmatic ("works for me") kinda way in the near future (within a
: month or so probably). I'm perfectly happy to let others beat me to
: it, or to jump in and do it when my project demands it.
Incidently, i hadn't really t
On Apr 7, 2006, at 4:10 PM, samuel kim wrote:
Do you think it's a matter of days, weeks or months?
Depends on whether you are going to implement it or wait for someone
else do it :)
I will eventually get around to implementing it myself, at least in a
pragmatic ("works for me") kinda way
Do you think it's a matter of days, weeks or months?> The current codebase does
not do field highlighting. It is something > that will be added in the near
future though, but if you need it > today you'll need to create a custom
request handler to implement it.> > Erik>
_
On Apr 7, 2006, at 12:20 AM, samuel kim wrote:
How do I get the return result to only return the contiguous
relevant word sequences separated by a "..."
Currently, it just returns the whole field.
The current codebase does not do field highlighting. It is something
that will be added in
Hi all,
How do I get the return result to only return the contiguous relevant word
sequences separated by a "..."
Currently, it just returns the whole field.
Thanks
-sam
_
Search on the go: Try Windows Live(tm) Search for Mobile