Hi all,
We have implemented collapse queries in place of grouped queries on our
production solr. As mentioned in solr documentation collapse queries are
recommended in place of grouped queries in terms of performance . But after
switching to collapsed queries from grouped queries response time of
I am using Solr 6.1.0. We have 2 shards and each has one replica.
My schema field is below in one collection
When I execute below query It is taking more than 180 milliseconds every time.
http://10.38.33.24:8983/solr/forms/select?q=project_id:(2117627+2102977+2109667+2102912+2113720+2102976+2102
filed X
>
>
>
> > We are able to see a decrease in index size but the response time has
> > increased.
>
> I can't say for sure, but I would imagine that when querying multiple
> fields using edismax, Solr can manage to do some of that work in
> parallel. But
On 11/19/2020 2:12 AM, Ajay Sharma wrote:
Earlier we were searching in 6 fields i.e qf is applied on 6 fields like
below
We merged all these 6 fields into one field X and now while searching we
using this single filed X
We are able to see a decrease in index size but the response time
Hi All,
Earlier we were searching in 6 fields i.e qf is applied on 6 fields like
below
A
B
C
D
E
F
We had assumed if we reduced the number of fields being used to search then
the index size and response time both will decrease.
We merged all these 6 fields into one field X and now
Hi,
We have upgraded our SOLR instances to 8.6.1, we are trying to change the
timeZone and enabling Response Time, below is our configuration, but the
change is not reflecting. true adding this
parameter throws exception.
File: server/etc/jetty_requestlog_xml
shards 2 replica each). During performance test, issue is few calls where
> > we have high response time, it is noticeable when test duration is small,
> > the response time improve when the test is for longer duration.
> >
> > Hope this information helps.
> >
> > Re
re we having query use case /need. This has 32 replica (16
> shards 2 replica each). During performance test, issue is few calls where
> we have high response time, it is noticeable when test duration is small,
> the response time improve when the test is for longer duration.
>
> Ho
have high response time, it is noticeable when test duration is small,
the response time improve when the test is for longer duration.
Hope this information helps.
Regards
Ganesh
Regards
Ganesh
On Sun, May 10, 2020, 8:14 PM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/10/2020 4:48 PM, Ganesh Sethuraman wr
On 5/10/2020 4:48 PM, Ganesh Sethuraman wrote:
The additional info is that when we execute the test for longer (20mins) we
are seeing better response time, however for a short test (5mins) and rerun
the test after an hour or so we are seeing slow response times again. Note
that we don't u
Here is a quick update based on your question, and few additional
information that will help
The additional info is that when we execute the test for longer (20mins) we
are seeing better response time, however for a short test (5mins) and rerun
the test after an hour or so we are seeing slow
Do not, repeat NOT expungeDelete after each deleteByQuery, it is
a very expensive operation. Perhaps after the nightly batch, but
I doubt that’ll help much anyway.
30% deleted docs is quite normal, and should definitely not
change the response time by a factor of 100! So there’s
some other issue
lower environment; that we don't see
updates or deletes, we see in Segment Info for each of the Solr code there
are ZERO delete percentages. Could this be the reason for the faster query
response time in our lower environment? in our production environment, we
are seeing about 30-32% of deletes i
On 3/22/2019 7:52 AM, Rajdeep Sahoo wrote:
My solr query sometime taking more than 60 sec to return the response .
Is there any way I can check why it is taking so much time .
Please let me know if there is any way to analyse this issue(high
response time ) .Thanks
With the information
Hi all,
My solr query sometime taking more than 60 sec to return the response .
Is there any way I can check why it is taking so much time .
Please let me know if there is any way to analyse this issue(high
response time ) .Thanks
Hi Rajdeep,
For production-deployment at my company, we are using prometheus exporter,
https://github.com/noony/prometheus-solr-exporter.
You can start the exporter along with solr server and the exporter will
collect important metrics from solr.
By the way, you need to install and configure pro
Rajdeep,
Not an external tool, but there is the option of using the "debug"
parameter in the Solr query that can be used at least as a starting point
for looking at the query timing.
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/common-query-parameters.html#CommonQueryParameters-ThedebugParameter
Bes
Hi all,
Please suggest, how can I analyze the time taken by a solr query?
Is there any tool for analyzing the query response time.I f there is any
way to do this please suggest.
On 10/19/2018 7:57 AM, Roopa Rao wrote:
From the past few months there has been a steady increase in the Solr
response time in our application, yes there are enhancements and index size
increase.
How to approach this issue to find the root cause for this slow and
constant increase? What
Hi All,
>From the past few months there has been a steady increase in the Solr
response time in our application, yes there are enhancements and index size
increase.
How to approach this issue to find the root cause for this slow and
constant increase? What parameters to check?
Any pointers
On 2/22/2018 10:45 AM, LOPEZ-CORTES Mariano-ext wrote:
For the moment, I have the following information:
12GB is max java heap. Total memory i don't know. No direct access to host.
2 replicas =
Size 1 = 11.51 GB
Size 2 = 11.82 GB
(Sizes showed in the Core-Overview admin gui)
O
De : Shawn Heisey [mailto:elyog...@elyograg.org]
Envoyé : jeudi 22 février 2018 17:06
À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Objet : Re: Response time under 1 second?
On 2/22/2018 8:53 AM, LOPEZ-CORTES Mariano-ext wrote:
> With a 3 nodes cluster each 12GB and a corpus of 5GB (CSV format).
>
&
On 2/22/2018 8:53 AM, LOPEZ-CORTES Mariano-ext wrote:
With a 3 nodes cluster each 12GB and a corpus of 5GB (CSV format).
Is it better to disable completely Solr cache ? There is enough RAM for the
entire index.
The size of the input data will have an effect on how big the index is,
but it is
Hello
With a 3 nodes cluster each 12GB and a corpus of 5GB (CSV format).
Is it better to disable completely Solr cache ? There is enough RAM for the
entire index.
Is there a way for reduce random queries under 1 second?
Thanks!
FYI. I recently did a study on 'Performance of Solr'
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/performance-comparison-solr-elasticsearch-deepak-goel/?trackingId=N2j9xWvVEQQaZYa%2BoEsy%2Bw%3D%3D
Deepak
"Please stop cruelty to Animals, help by becoming a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Facebook: h
Hi Aashish,
Can you tell us a bit more about the size of your index and if you are running
updates at the same time, types of queries, tests (is it some randomized query
or some predefined), how many test threads do you use?
Thanks,
Emir
--
Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detect
Hi,
Solr query time for a request comes aroung 10-12ms. But when I am hitting
the queries parallely the qtime rises to 900 ms but there is no significant
increase in cpu load. I am using solr with default memory settings. How can
I optimize to give less query time.
Thanks in advance.
Aashish Ag
lighting has changed significantly
so that's one place I'd look.
And I'm assuming you're running a suite of tests, trying just a few
queries is uninformative due to loading parts of the index into
memory.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 1:09 AM, guenterh.li...@bluewin.ch
w
lighting has changed significantly
so that's one place I'd look.
And I'm assuming you're running a suite of tests, trying just a few
queries is uninformative due to loading parts of the index into
memory.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 1:09 AM, guenterh.li...@bluewin.ch
w
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 1:09 AM, guenterh.li...@bluewin.ch
wrote:
> Hi,
> we are updating our SOLR infrastructure from version 4.10.2 to the latest
> 6.6.
>
> We realize a significant degradation of the response time while running
> match-all queries with facets (query in [1]) With ver
Hi,
we are updating our SOLR infrastructure from version 4.10.2 to the latest 6.6.
We realize a significant degradation of the response time while running
match-all queries with facets (query in [1]) With version 4.x these kind of
queries never took longer than 2000 ms.
Now all of these queries
we are using solr as nosql database and periodically update large amount of
document and then commit changes(using commitwithin).and query response time
grows at least twice when it is happening.what can we do with this
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com
and see if they also take 15ms. I often
see 15ms, 16ms, 31ms, and 32ms when timing stuff on Windows.
-Michael
-Original Message-
From: Scott Johnson [mailto:sjohn...@dag.com]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 5:58 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Inconsistent response
: Solr for large and time consuming queries. We have found a very inconsistent
: result in the time elapsed when pinging Solr. If we ping Solr from a desktop
: Windows 7 machine, there is usually a 5 ms elapsed time. But if we ping the
: same Solr instance from a Windows Server 2008 machine, it tak
Thanks for the recommendation, but that is not making a difference here.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Della Bitta [mailto:michael.della.bi...@appinions.com]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 2:00 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Inconsistent response time
Hi Scott,
Any
10017
t: @appinions | g+: plus.google.com/appinions
w: appinions.com
On Oct 3, 2014, at 15:08, Scott Johnson wrote:
> We are attempting to improve our Solr response time as our application uses
> Solr for large and time consuming queries. We have found a very inconsistent
> result in
We are attempting to improve our Solr response time as our application uses
Solr for large and time consuming queries. We have found a very inconsistent
result in the time elapsed when pinging Solr. If we ping Solr from a desktop
Windows 7 machine, there is usually a 5 ms elapsed time. But if we
tirely in OS system memory for file caching? If not,
> you could be incurring tons of IO.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Yossi Biton
> Sent: Friday, July 4, 2014 7:25 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Using solr for image retrie
Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Yossi Biton
Sent: Friday, July 4, 2014 7:25 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Using solr for image retrieval - very long response time
Hello there,
Recently I was trying to implement the bag-of-words model for image
retrieval by using Solr
e platform (hope i'm not wrong), as it provides
tf-idf ranking.
Currently i'm issuing the following problem :
My images usually contains about 1,000 words, so it means the query
consists of 1,000 terms.
When using simple select query with 1,000 OR i get a very long response
time (100s for
On 6/13/2014 9:36 AM, Sven Kiesewetter wrote:
> I've got a problem with SolrJ taking 20-60 seconds to return some queries.
> It doesn't happen often, but often enough to pose a problem. So far, I
> haven't been able to pin down the cause.
>
> The server is running Solr 1.4.1 and I'm using SolrJ 1.4
Hi all!
I've got a problem with SolrJ taking 20-60 seconds to return some queries.
It doesn't happen often, but often enough to pose a problem. So far, I
haven't been able to pin down the cause.
The server is running Solr 1.4.1 and I'm using SolrJ 1.4.0. Another Solr
server is used for replicatio
Can you please open a Jira issue? It'd be nice to have this.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Branham, Jeremy [HR] <
jeremy.d.bran...@sprint.com> wrote:
> Is there a JMX metric for measuring the cache request time?
>
> I can see the avg request times, but I'm assuming this includes the cache
> an
Hi Jeremy,
Nothing in Solr tracks that time. Caches are pluggable. If you really
want this info you could write your own cache that is just a proxy for the
real cache and then you can time it.
But why do you need this info? Do you suspect that is slow?
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring * Log Ana
increasing.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Branham, Jeremy [HR] [mailto:jeremy.d.bran...@sprint.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 1:33 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Cache response time
Is there a JMX metric for measuring the cache request time?
I can see the avg request times, b
Is there a JMX metric for measuring the cache request time?
I can see the avg request times, but I'm assuming this includes the cache and
non-cache values.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceFactors
This e-mail may contain Sprint proprietary informat
.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Adding-filter-query-slows-down-avg-response-time-tp4120555p4120662.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Found and here,
may be it's because my filter query is changing for each new user. Better i
keep it in main query
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/fq-vs-q-td495570.html
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Adding-filter-query-slows-down-avg-response
geofilt pt=20.2284,80.2284 sfield=ps_lat_long d=4}
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Adding-filter-query-slows-down-avg-response-time-tp4120555.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
n records.They are separated into 2
> shards without any replica.I have not changed any caching and every setting
> is a default one.In one case I have to return get top 5 candidates form
> the Solr. The response time approximately 50 seconds which is too high for
> me.
> How I
I have a Solr Cloud setup with 220 million records.They are separated into 2
shards without any replica.I have not changed any caching and every setting
is a default one.In one case I have to return get top 5 candidates form
the Solr. The response time approximately 50 seconds which is too
SOLR's QTime represents actual time it spent on searching, where as your c#
client response time might be the total time spent in sending HTTP request
and getting back the response(which might also include parsing the results)
.
Regards
Pravesh
--
View this message in context:
http://l
Hello,
QTime counts only searching and filtering, but not writing response, which
includes retrieving the stored fields (&fl=...). So, it's quite reasonable.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:09 AM, 张浓飞 wrote:
> I have a solr website with about 500 docs ( 30 fileds defined in schema
> ), and a c# cli
arch time complexity, such as
> geofilt on LatLonType fields? Is it logN?
>
> Thanks!
> TJ
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Spatial-Search-response-time-complexity-tp4012801.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi all,
Does anyone know the Solr (lucene)spatial search time complexity, such as
geofilt on LatLonType fields? Is it logN?
Thanks!
TJ
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Spatial-Search-response-time-complexity-tp4012801.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
> it helpful?
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/long-query-response-time-in-shards-search-tp4012366p4012628.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
se in main core that just merge search results, is
it helpful?
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/long-query-response-time-in-shards-search-tp4012366p4012628.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ned without
re-querying the index.)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jason
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 12:26 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: long query response time in shards search
Hi, Otis
Thanks your reply.
yes, all cores are in same server.
* what do yo
res include 15million docs and size is 400G.
complex queries are problem??
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/long-query-response-time-in-shards-search-tp4012366p4012378.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
We're running 10 solr cores(c00,c01,...,c09) in a box and querying like
http://x.x.x.x/c00/select?q=test&shards=c00,c01,..,c09
This means all of the result are merged in core c00.
Is this not good use in shards search?
When we analyze log file, query response time in core c00 is often
That's why most people looking for the "full response time" usually get
this info from the ServletContainer (logs), because it's the only place
that knows for certain when the request is *DONE* done.
: Please advise if:
: - Flowcharts for any solr/lucene-related lifecycles exist
o add some additional logging to a solr 3.6.0 setup to
> allow us to determine actual time spent by Solr responding to a
> request.
>
> We have a custom QueryComponent that sometimes returns 1+ MB of data
> and while QTime is always on the order of ~100ms, the response time at
>
Greetings,
I'm looking to add some additional logging to a solr 3.6.0 setup to
allow us to determine actual time spent by Solr responding to a
request.
We have a custom QueryComponent that sometimes returns 1+ MB of data
and while QTime is always on the order of ~100ms, the response time a
.org/solr/FieldCollapsing
Best
Erick
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Sujatha Arun wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am Looking into trigger point for sharding Indexes based on response time
> ,and would like to define an acceptable response time.
>
> Given a 3GB index ,when Can i think of sh
Hello,
I am Looking into trigger point for sharding Indexes based on response time
,and would like to define an acceptable response time.
Given a 3GB index ,when Can i think of sharding .The response times being
variable based on the query and varies from 100ms to
600ms .We are running solr
Thans Chris for clarifying. This helps a lot.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Chris Hostetter-3 [via Lucene] <
ml-node+s472066n3630181...@n3.nabble.com> wrote:
> : If your log level is set at least to INFO, as it should be by default
> Solr does
> : log response time to a differen
: If your log level is set at least to INFO, as it should be by default Solr
does
: log response time to a different file. E.g., I have
: INFO: [] webapp=/solr path=/select/
: params={indent=on&start=0&q=*:*&version=2.2&rows=10} hits=22 status=0
: QTime=40
: where the QTime
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Jithin wrote:
> Thanks Gora for clarifying. So if my understanding is correct then the total
> response time is not logged in solr logs and I need to rely on the QTime in
> the response.
If your log level is set at least to INFO, as it should be by def
Thanks Gora for clarifying. So if my understanding is correct then the total
response time is not logged in solr logs and I need to rely on the QTime in
the response.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Interpreting-solr-response-time-from-log-tp3624340p3624931
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Jithin wrote:
[...]
> which indicates response time is 2 ms.
>
> But in solr log its been seen as 01/Jan/2012:06:25:16 +] "GET
> /solr/core0/admin/ping HTTP/1.1" 200 *544*
> Can anyone please explain to me why the logs is showing
Hi,
For this request curl 'solrhost:8983/solr/core0/admin/ping' response is
0*2*falseall110truefalse10allsolrpingquerysearchOK
which indicates response time is 2 ms.
But in solr log its been seen as 01/Jan/2012:06:25:16 +] "GET
/solr/core0/admin/ping HTTP/1.1" 2
this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/High-response-time-after-being-idle-tp3616599p3618096.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: Is it possible that the system is running out of RAM, and swapping,
: or is aggressively swapping for some reason?
it doesn't have to be the solr /tomcat process memory getting swapped out
-- but that's certainly possible -- it could also be that the filesystem
cache is expunging the disk pag
icsearch/issues/464
Otis
Performance Monitoring SaaS for Solr -
http://sematext.com/spm/solr-performance-monitoring/index.html
>
> From: Erick Erickson
>To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 5:07 PM
>Subject:
What else, if anything, do you have running on the server?
Because it's possible that pages are being swapped out
for other processes to use.
Solr itself shouldn't, as far as I know, time out anything so I
expect you're running into issues with the op system.
Best
Erick
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 1
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Odey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm running Solr 3.5 on a XAMPP/Tomcat environment. It's working pretty good
> for just one exception: when Solr remains idle without handling any requests
> for about 5-10 mins the first request sent again will be delayed for a few
> secon
I checked my logfiles - but querytime itself is not affected and I couldn't
find any dysfunctionalities or error-messages.
Are there Solr specific preferences which could cause me trouble?
Any help would be appreciated.
regards,
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabb
-day.png
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n3527914/_avg_response_query_time-22-11-2011_15_50_17.png
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Unexpected-cpu-load-and-Solr-incrase-response-time-tp3527914p3527914.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive
ant to change to solr to try to solve this problem.
>
> i. Can anyone tell me the response time for querys on pdf documents on solr?
>
>
> ii. Can anyone tell me some strategies to reduce this response time?
>
>
>
> Note: the pdf is not indexed in a simple way. The pdf is co
o Iglesias; Leo; Marcos; Mario Crespo
> (Silvereme); 'Rode'
> Subject: response time for pdf indexing
>
> Hi !
>
>
>
> We are using Zend Search based on Lucene. Our indexing pdf consultations
> take longer than 2 seconds.
>
>
>
> We want to chan
Hi !
We are using Zend Search based on Lucene. Our indexing pdf consultations
take longer than 2 seconds.
We want to change to solr to try to solve this problem.
i. Can anyone tell me the response time for querys on pdf documents on solr?
ii. Can anyone tell me some strategies to
Thanks a lot!
you mean i have to increase the resources.
1.Can the distributed search improve the speed.?
2.I have read from some thread that spellchecker takes time.Is spellchecker
is one of the curlprit for more response time?
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Shawn Heisey-4 [via Lucene
On 12/21/2010 3:02 AM, Anurag wrote:
I am using spellchecker in the query part. Now my search time has become
more. say initiallly it was 1000ms now its 3000ms.I have data index of size
9GB.
My query http://localhost:8983/solr/spellCheckCompRH/?q=
http://localhost:8983/solr/spellCheckCompRH/?q="+
context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/improving-search-response-time-tp1204491p2125220.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thx. I will let you know the latest status.
>From: Lance Norskog
>Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org, newsam
>Subject: Re: Re:The search response time is too loong
>Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:34:53 -0700
>
>Copy the index. Delete half of th
veral shards from the existing 8G index file, such as
> 4G per shards. Is there any tool to generate two shards from one 8G index
> file?
>
>>From: kenf_nc
>>Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>>To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>>Subject: Re: Re:The search respon
ply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Re:The search response time is too loong
>Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 05:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
>"mem usage is over 400M", do you mean Tomcat mem size? If you don't give your
>cache si
2010/9/27 newsam :
> I have setup a SOLR searcher instance with Tomcat 5.5.21. However, the
> response time is too long. Here is my scenario:
> 1. The index file is 8.2G. The doc num is 6110745.
> 2. DELL Server: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU (4 cores) 3.00GHZ, 6G Mem.
>
> I used &q
wly rebooted) instance.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Re-The-search-response-time-is-too-loong-tp1587395p1588554.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Re-The-search-response-time-is-too-loong-tp1587395p1588554.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
We used SOLR 1.4. All queries were excuted in SOLR back-end. I guess that I/O
operations consume the time too much.
>From: "newsam"
>Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org"newsam"
>To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>Subject: Re:The search response time is too loo
I have setup a SOLR searcher instance with Tomcat 5.5.21. However, the response
time is too long. Here is my scenario:
1. The index file is 8.2G. The doc num is 6110745.
2. DELL Server: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU (4 cores) 3.00GHZ, 6G Mem.
I used "Key:*" to query all records by localhost
SD hard
> drive?
>
> Thanks,
> -Muneeb
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/improving-search-response-time-tp1204491p1226372.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
/DRAM storage... Is anyone using
SSDs for solr application?
What would be a better route to take? more memory or flash based SSD hard
drive?
Thanks,
-Muneeb
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/improving-search-response-time-tp1204491p1226372.html
Sent from the Solr
ds etc
>>
>> /select?start=0&rows=20&fl=id&hl=true&hl.fl=title%2Cabstract%2Cauthors&hl.fragsize=300&hl.simple.pre=&hl.simple.post=<%2Fstrong>&qt=dismax&q=gene
>> therapy
>>
>> We also get queries with filters examples:
>>
tart=0&rows=20&fl=id&hl=true&hl.fl=title%2Cabstract%2Cauthors&hl.fragsize=300&hl.simple.pre=&hl.simple.post=<%2Fstrong>&qt=dismax&q=gene
therapy&fq=meshterm:(gene)&fq=author:(david)
e) How do you load balance queries between the slaves?
proxy based load b
load balance
f) What is your search latency now and @ what QPS? Also, where do you
measure time - on the API or on the end-user page?
Average response time: 2600 - 3000 ms with average throughput: 4-6 rpm
(from 'new relic RPM' solr performance monitor)
g) How often do you replicate?
Da
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 05:18:34 -0700 (PDT)
Muneeb Ali wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I need some guidance over improving search response time for our
> catalog search.
[...]
> I would appreciate if anyone with similar background could shed
> some light on upgrading hardware in our
4.18, Muneeb Ali wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I need some guidance over improving search response time for our catalog
> search. we are using solr 1.4.0 version and have master/slave setup (3
> dedicated servers, one being the master and other two slaves). The server
> specs are as follo
Hi All,
I need some guidance over improving search response time for our catalog
search. we are using solr 1.4.0 version and have master/slave setup (3
dedicated servers, one being the master and other two slaves). The server
specs are as follows:
Quad Core 2.5Ghz 1333mhz
12GB Ram
2x250GB
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
