2009/4/24 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
> looks like a bug.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1126
>
>
This should be fixed in trunk and the latest nightly build.
--
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
t; 93
>
> ?
>
> _b7u.tvf
> 1240502374000
> 38262
>
> ?
>
> _b7u.tvd
> 1240502374000
> 3474
>
>
> ?
>
> ?
>
> solrconfig.xml
> slave_solrconfig.xml
> 1239712292000
> 876307977
> 33857
>
> ?
>
> schema.xml
> 1237313545
?
elevate.xml
123621333
790732532
1274
?
synonyms.txt
1237990595000
816919275
68713
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Akshay
> Reply-To:
> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:37:54 +0530
> To:
> Subject: Re: replicated index files
eer, Zappos.com
> jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
>
>
> > From: Jian Han Guo
> > Reply-To:
> > Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:43:02 -0700
> > To:
> > Subject: Re: replicated index files have incorrect timestamp
> >
> > I am using Mac OS 10.5.
&g
: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:43:02 -0700
> To:
> Subject: Re: replicated index files have incorrect timestamp
>
> I am using Mac OS 10.5.
>
> I can't access the box right now and this week. I'll do it next week and
> post the result then.
>
> Thanks,
>
&
I am using Mac OS 10.5.
I can't access the box right now and this week. I'll do it next week and
post the result then.
Thanks,
Jianhan
2009/4/22 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
> which OS are you using?
>
> it does not look at the timestamps to decide if the index is in sync .
> It looks at the ind
which OS are you using?
it does not look at the timestamps to decide if the index is in sync .
It looks at the index version only.
BTW can you just hit the master withe url and paste the response here
http://:/solr/replication?command=filelist
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Jian Han Guo wro
That's right. The timestamp of files on the slave side are all Dec 31 1969,
so it looks the timestamp was not set (and therefore it is zero). The ones
on the master side are all correct. Nevertheless, solr seems being able to
recognize that master and slave are in sync after replication. Don't kno
Let me assume that you are using the in-inbuilt replication.
The replication ties to set the timestamp of all the files same as
that of the files in the master. just cross check.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Jian Han Guo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using nightly build on 4/22/2009. Replication wor
Jian Han Guo
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 9:27:44 PM
> Subject: replicated index files have incorrect timestamp
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using nightly build on 4/22/2009. Replication works fine, but the files
> inside index directory on slave
Hi,
I am using nightly build on 4/22/2009. Replication works fine, but the files
inside index directory on slave side all have old timestamp: Dec 31 1969.
Is this a known issue?
Thanks,
Jianhan
11 matches
Mail list logo
