Re: relaxed vs. improved validation in solr.TrieDateField

2016-05-06 Thread David Smiley
Sorry to hear that Uwe Reh. If this is just in your input/index data, then this could be handled with an URP, maybe evan an existing URP. See ParseDateFieldUpdateProcessorFactory which uses the Joda-time API. I am not sure if that will work, I'm a little doubtful in fact since Solr now uses the J

relaxed vs. improved validation in solr.TrieDateField

2016-04-29 Thread Uwe Reh
Hi, doing some migration tests (4.10 to 6.0) I recognized a improved validation of TrieDateField. Syntactical correct but impossible days are rejected now. (stack trace at the end of the mail) Examples: - '1997-02-29T00:00:00Z' - '2006-06-31T00:00:00Z' - '2000-00-00T00:00:00Z' The first two d