David,
thanks, looking forward to LUCENE-5648. I added a comment about
supporting BC dates. We currently use the spatial support to index date
ranges with a precision of one day, ranging from year - to .
Just for the record, I had some issues converting bounding box
Intersects querie
Hi Era,
I appreciate the scattered documentation is confusing for users. The use
of spatial for time durations is definitely not an official way to do it;
it’s clearly a hack/trick — one that works pretty well if you know the
issues to watch out for. So I don’t see it getting documented on the
r
David,
I made a note about your mentioning the deprecation below to take it
into account in our software, but now that I tried to find out more
about this I ran into some confusion since the Solr documentation
regarding spatial searches is currently quite badly scattered and partly
obsolete [
Am 03.03.2014 19:12, schrieb Smiley, David W.:
The main reference for this approach is here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialForTimeDurations
Hoss’s illustrations he developed for the meetup presentation are great.
However, there are bugs in the instruction — specifically it’s important
to s
The main reference for this approach is here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialForTimeDurations
Hoss’s illustrations he developed for the meetup presentation are great.
However, there are bugs in the instruction — specifically it’s important
to slightly buffer the query and choose an appropriat
Right, thanks Shawn for looking up the URLs. That's exactly what I was
thinking of.
Erick
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 3/1/2014 11:41 AM, Thomas Scheffler wrote:
>> Am 01.03.14 18:24, schrieb Erick Erickson:
>>> I'm not clear what you're really after here.
>>>
>>
On 3/1/2014 11:41 AM, Thomas Scheffler wrote:
> Am 01.03.14 18:24, schrieb Erick Erickson:
>> I'm not clear what you're really after here.
>>
>> Solr certainly supports ranges, things like time:[* TO date_spec] or
>> date_field:[date_spec TO date_spec] etc.
>>
>>
>> There's also a really creative u
Looks like you might be able to use sub-documents (or whatever it is called in
SOLR) for this; create the parent document without any dates, and a child
document for each date range.
On 01 Mar 2014, at 19:41 , Thomas Scheffler
wrote:
> Am 01.03.14 18:24, schrieb Erick Erickson:
>> I'm not cle
Am 01.03.14 18:24, schrieb Erick Erickson:
I'm not clear what you're really after here.
Solr certainly supports ranges, things like time:[* TO date_spec] or
date_field:[date_spec TO date_spec] etc.
There's also a really creative use of spatial (of all things) to, say
answer questions involving
Best,
Erick
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 6:19 AM, Thomas Scheffler
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am in the need of range types in SOLR - similar to PostgreSQL:
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/images/7/73/Range-types-pgopen-2012.pdf
>
> My schema should allow approximate dates and queries on
Hi,
I am in the need of range types in SOLR - similar to PostgreSQL:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/images/7/73/Range-types-pgopen-2012.pdf
My schema should allow approximate dates and queries on that. When
having a single such date per document one can split this information
into two separate
11 matches
Mail list logo
