>
> Hmm, I saw the comment in ClusteringDocumentList.java of Carrot2:
>
> /*
> * If you know what query generated the documents you're about to cluster,
> pass
> * the query to the algorithm, which will usually increase clustering
> quality.
> */
> attributes.put(AttributeNames.QUERY, "data mining"
>
> 1. if q=*:* is requested, Carrot2 will receive "MatchAllDocsQuery"
>> via attributes. Is it OK?
>>
>
> Yes, it only clusters on the Doc List, not the Doc Set (in other words,
> it's your rows that matter)
Just to add to that: Carrot2 should be able to cluster up to ~1000 search
results, but b
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On May 22, 2009, at 11:41 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
I'm thinking using clustering (SOLR-769) function for my project.
I have a couple of questions:
1. if q=*:* is requested, Carrot2 will receive "MatchAllDocsQuery"
via attributes. Is it OK?
Yes, it only clusters on t
On May 22, 2009, at 11:41 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
I'm thinking using clustering (SOLR-769) function for my project.
I have a couple of questions:
1. if q=*:* is requested, Carrot2 will receive "MatchAllDocsQuery"
via attributes. Is it OK?
Yes, it only clusters on the Doc List, not the Doc
I'm thinking using clustering (SOLR-769) function for my project.
I have a couple of questions:
1. if q=*:* is requested, Carrot2 will receive "MatchAllDocsQuery"
via attributes. Is it OK?
2. I'd like to use it on an environment other than English, e.g. Japanese.
I've implemented Carrot2Japanese
