Re: question about text field and WordDelimiterFilter in example schema.xml

2009-10-27 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Bill Au wrote: > Here is my example. > With the current text field, the query term "iPhone" will not match document > containing the string "iphone" because "iPhone" is analyzed into two terms: > i(1) and phone(2). Right. The limitations are known... but we do

Re: question about text field and WordDelimiterFilter in example schema.xml

2009-10-27 Thread Bill Au
I have been playing with this using the analysis.jsp. I am still not clear why we don't want to catenate at query time. Here is my example. With the current text field, the query term "iPhone" will not match document containing the string "iphone" because "iPhone" is analyzed into two terms: i(1

Re: question about text field and WordDelimiterFilter in example schema.xml

2009-10-20 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Bill Au wrote: > I have a question regarding the use of the WordDelimiterFilter in the text > field in the example schema.xml.  The parameters are set differently for the > indexing and querying.  Namely, catenateWords and catenateNumbers are set > differently.  Sh

question about text field and WordDelimiterFilter in example schema.xml

2009-10-20 Thread Bill Au
I have a question regarding the use of the WordDelimiterFilter in the text field in the example schema.xml. The parameters are set differently for the indexing and querying. Namely, catenateWords and catenateNumbers are set differently. Shouldn't the same analysis be done at both index and query