Yes, that works! I had to boost the firstDestination field to have it well
sorted. Any ideas why the score might be equally for all the documents
returned?
Thanks a lot!
Federico
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Question-about-sorting-by-a-field
How about having a single-valued field named "firstDestination" that has the
first destination in the list, and then your query could be something like
'destination:"Buenos Aires" firstDestination:"Buenos Aires"'. Docs that match
both should have a higher score and thus will be listed first.
-M
t doesn't
seem to be working on my end so far.
Thanks in advanced!
Federico
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Question-about-sorting-by-a-field-tp3673491p3673491.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Ahhh, you're right. I know there's been some discussion in the past about
how to find out the number of terms that matched, but don't remember the
outcome off-hand. You might try searching the mail archive for something like
"number of matching terms" or some such.
Sorry I'm not more help
Erick
O
On 02/06/11 13:32, Erick Erickson wrote:
Say you're trying to match terms A, B, C. Would something like
(A AND B AND C)^1000 OR (A AND B)^100 OR (A AND C)^100 OR (B AND
C)^100 OR A OR B OR C
work? It wouldn't be an absolute ordering, but it would tend to
push the documents where all three terms
Say you're trying to match terms A, B, C. Would something like
(A AND B AND C)^1000 OR (A AND B)^100 OR (A AND C)^100 OR (B AND
C)^100 OR A OR B OR C
work? It wouldn't be an absolute ordering, but it would tend to
push the documents where all three terms matched toward
the top.
It would get real
Hi,
I am trying to solve a sorting problem using Solr. The sorting requirements are
a bit complicated.
I have to sort the documents by three different criteria:
- First by number of keywords that match (coordination factor)
- Then, within the documents that match the same number of keywords, s
On 6/12/07, Xuesong Luo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks, Yonik. Unfortunately we have users whose first names contain
more than one word, it seems copy field is my only option.
Yes, if you need to be able to match on part of a first name, rather
than just exact first name.
-Yonik
-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: question about sorting
On 6/11/07, Xuesong Luo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For example, first name, department, job title etc.
Something like first name might be able to be a single field that is
searchable and sortable (use a keyword tokenizer foll
On 6/11/07, Xuesong Luo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For example, first name, department, job title etc.
Something like first name might be able to be a single field that is
searchable and sortable (use a keyword tokenizer followed by a
lowercase filter). If the field contains multiple words, an
For example, first name, department, job title etc.
Thanks
Xuesong
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik
Seeley
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 6:35 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: question about sorting
On 6/11/07, Xuesong
On 6/11/07, Xuesong Luo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My sorting fields include both TextField type and StrField type. Because
TextField uses TokenizerFactory, they can't be sorted. I have to copy
each TextField to a StrField and sort on those StrFields. Does anyone
know if there is a better way to
Hi,
My sorting fields include both TextField type and StrField type. Because
TextField uses TokenizerFactory, they can't be sorted. I have to copy
each TextField to a StrField and sort on those StrFields. Does anyone
know if there is a better way to do that?
Thanks
Xuesong
13 matches
Mail list logo
