Re: question about an entry in the log file

2017-09-20 Thread kaveh minooie
Thanks Shalin, that was very helpfull. On 09/20/2017 01:02 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: That log shows that the searcher being opened is the "realtime" searcher as opposed to the "main" searcher. The realtime searcher is quite lightweight. It causes a flush of built index segments from the m

Re: question about an entry in the log file

2017-09-20 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar
That log shows that the searcher being opened is the "realtime" searcher as opposed to the "main" searcher. The realtime searcher is quite lightweight. It causes a flush of built index segments from the memory to the disk and opens a new searcher over them. No autowarming or fsync happens for realt

Re: question about an entry in the log file

2017-09-20 Thread kaveh minooie
Hi Erick Thanks for your response. I understand your point, but what I was asking was does solr reopen searchers after a commit call even if the commit was called with openSearcher=false since this is what seems to be happening based on these log entries? Also, it seems that if autocommit is

Re: question about an entry in the log file

2017-09-20 Thread Erick Erickson
First, I would not recommend you call commit from the client. It's usually far better to let your autocommit settings in solrconfig.xml deal with it. When you need to search, you either need to configure with true or set to something other than -1. https://lucidworks.com/2013/08/23/understandin

question about an entry in the log file

2017-09-19 Thread kaveh minooie
Hi eveyone I am trying to figure out why calling commit from my client takes a very long time in an environment with concurrent updates, and I see the following snippet in the solr log files when client calls for commit. my question is regarding the third info. what is it opening? and how can