forget to say: thanks again! Now the cache gets hits!
Regards,
Peter.
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Peter Karich wrote:
>
>> Thanks a lot Yonik! Rounding makes sense.
>> Is there a date math for the 'LAST_COMMIT'?
>>
> No - but it's an interesting idea!
>
> -Yonik
> http://www.lucid
Hi Yonik,
would you point me to the Java classes where solr handles a commit or an
optimize and then the date math definitions?
Regards,
Peter.
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Peter Karich wrote:
>
>> Thanks a lot Yonik! Rounding makes sense.
>> Is there a date math for the 'LAST_COMMIT'?
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Peter Karich wrote:
> Thanks a lot Yonik! Rounding makes sense.
> Is there a date math for the 'LAST_COMMIT'?
No - but it's an interesting idea!
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
Thanks a lot Yonik! Rounding makes sense.
Is there a date math for the 'LAST_COMMIT'?
Peter.
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Peter Karich wrote:
>
>> my queryResultCache has no hits. But if I am removing one line from the
>> bf section in my dismax handler all is fine. Here is the line:
>>
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Peter Karich wrote:
> my queryResultCache has no hits. But if I am removing one line from the
> bf section in my dismax handler all is fine. Here is the line:
> recip(ms(NOW,date),3.16e-11,1,1)
NOW has millisecond resolution, so it's actually a different query
eac
Hi all,
my queryResultCache has no hits. But if I am removing one line from the
bf section in my dismax handler all is fine. Here is the line:
recip(ms(NOW,date),3.16e-11,1,1)
According to
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#How_can_I_boost_the_score_of_newer_documents
this should be fi
