> select?q=*:*&fq=title:(+lowe')&debugQuery=on&rows=0
> >
> > "wildcard queries are not analyzed" http://search-lucene.com/m/pnmlH14o6eM1/
> >
>
> Yeah I found out about this a couple of minutes after I
> posted my problem. If there is no analyzer then
> why is Solr not finding any documents whe
On 2010-11-11, at 3:45 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>> I'm having some trouble with a query using some wildcard
>> and I was wondering if anyone could tell me why these two
>> similar queries do not return the same number of results.
>> Basically, the query I'm making should return all docs whose
>> t
> I'm having some trouble with a query using some wildcard
> and I was wondering if anyone could tell me why these two
> similar queries do not return the same number of results.
> Basically, the query I'm making should return all docs whose
> title starts
> (or contain) the string "lowe'". I suspe
Hi All,
I'm having some trouble with a query using some wildcard and I was wondering if
anyone could tell me why these two
similar queries do not return the same number of results. Basically, the query
I'm making should return all docs whose title starts
(or contain) the string "lowe'". I suspe
Thank you so much guys. You solved my problem :) :)
The problem was I was using stemming, I removed that it works perfectly now.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Problem-with-Wildcard-searches-in-Solr-tp961448p963744.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
hi,
sorry realised i had a typo:
> of course, non of this is going to sort out trying to match against the query
> "co?mput?r" because you've probably stemmed "computer" to "comput" or
> something
> at index time -- but if you add in a copyfield to an extra field that
> isn't stemmed
> at query
Hi,
earlier this week i started messing with getting wildcard queries to
be analysed
i've got some weird analysers doing stemming/lowercasing and writing
in the same rules into a custom queryparser didn't seem logical given
i just want the analysers to apply as they do at index time
i ca
!
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: imranak [mailto:imranak...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 12. Juli 2010 23:55
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: RE: Problem with Wildcard searches in Solr
Hi,
Thanks for you response. The dismax query parser doesn't support it but I heard
the edismax parser sup
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 4:39 PM, imranak wrote:
> A general search like 'computer' returns results but 'com*er' doesn't return
> any results.
This is due to issues with wildcards and stemming.
"computer" is indexed and searched as "comput"... but it's not
generally possible to stem wildcarded ter
ubject: RE: Problem with Wildcard searches in Solr
Hi,
Thanks for you response. The dismax query parser doesn't support it but I
heard the edismax parser supports all kinds of wildcards. Been trying it out
but without any luck. Could someone please help me with that. I'm unable to
mak
k.
Thanks.
Imran.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Problem-with-Wildcard-searches-in-Solr-tp961448p961617.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
,
-Original message-
From: imranak
Sent: Mon 12-07-2010 22:40
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org;
Subject: Problem with Wildcard searches in Solr
Hi,
I am having a problem doing wildcard searches in lucene syntax using the
edismax handler. I have Solr 4.0 nightly build from the trunk.
A
to fix it.
Thanks.
Regards,
Imran.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Problem-with-Wildcard-searches-in-Solr-tp961448p961448.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Another thing to remember about wildcard and fuzzy searches is that none
of the token filters will be applied.
If you are using the LowerCaseFilterFactory at index time, then
"RI-MC50034-1" gets converted to "ri-mc50034-1" which is never going to
match "RI-MC5000*"
Also, I would probably use
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Jörg Agatz wrote:
> Hi Users...
>
> i have a Problem
>
> I have a lot of fields, (type=text) for search in all fields i copy all
> fields in the default text field and use this for default search.
>
> Now i will search...
>
> This is into a Field
>
> "RI-MC
Hi Users...
i have a Problem
I have a lot of fields, (type=text) for search in all fields i copy all
fields in the default text field and use this for default search.
Now i will search...
This is into a Field
"RI-MC500034-1"
when i search "RI-MC500034-1" i found it...
if i seacht "RI-M
16 matches
Mail list logo