(NOTE: this discussion probably makes more sense on solr-dev. future
replies should probably go there, or in SOLR-334.)
: The parser is a quick hack I threw together, and any value source
: factories should not be exposed to it. It seems like either
: 1) a value source factory would expose th
On 9/18/07, Jon Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reflection could be used to look up and invoke the constructor with
> appropriately-typed arguments. If we assume only "primitive" types
> and ValueSources are used, I don't think it would be too hard to craft
> a drop-in replacement that works w
to instantiate the function. Did
> you have an alternate approach in mind? Are there any other things this
> would need to do?
>
> Is anyone else working on this?
>
> Tom
>
>
>
>
> On 9/18/07, Jon Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I see Y
ny other things this
would need to do?
Is anyone else working on this?
Tom
On 9/18/07, Jon Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I see Yonik recently opened an issue in JIRA to track the addition of
> pluggable functions (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-356).
> Any cha
I see Yonik recently opened an issue in JIRA to track the addition of
pluggable functions (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-356).
Any chance this will be implemented soon? It would save users like me
from having to hack the Solr source or write custom request handlers
for trivial
