Re: performance sorting multivalued field

2010-06-25 Thread Marc Sturlese
ringIndexCache.createValue(FieldCacheImpl.java:706)... But, it's already fixed for Lucene 2.9.4, 3.0.3, 3.1, 4.0 versions: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2142 -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/performance-sorting-multivalued-field-tp905943

Re: performance sorting multivalued field

2010-06-24 Thread Marc Sturlese
n-same-code-td503761.html Could be that solr 1.4 or lucene 2.9.1 handle this avoiding the error? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/performance-sorting-multivalued-field-tp905943p920464.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: performance sorting multivalued field

2010-06-24 Thread wojtekpia
3.nabble.com/Different-sort-behavior-on-same-code-td503761.html -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/performance-sorting-multivalued-field-tp905943p920012.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: performance sorting multivalued field

2010-06-24 Thread Chris Hostetter
: I just like play with things. First checked the behavior of sorting on : multiValued field and what I noticed was, let's say you have docs with field sorting on a multivalued is defined to have un-specified behavior. it might fail with an error, or it might fail silently. fundementally solr

Re: performance sorting multivalued field

2010-06-22 Thread Erick Erickson
t; Sorting by the field num what you get is: > After sorting asc I get: doc2,doc1,doc3. > The behavior seems to be always the same (I am not saying it works like > that > but it's what I've seen in my examples) > After seeing that I just decided to check the performance. Th

Re: performance sorting multivalued field

2010-06-22 Thread Marc Sturlese
orting by the field num what you get is: After sorting asc I get: doc2,doc1,doc3. The behavior seems to be always the same (I am not saying it works like that but it's what I've seen in my examples) After seeing that I just decided to check the performance. The point is simply curiosity.

Re: performance sorting multivalued field

2010-06-21 Thread Erick Erickson
t care for my tests. > What I need to know if there is any performance issue in all of this. > Thanks > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/performance-sorting-multivalued-field-tp905943p907502.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: performance sorting multivalued field

2010-06-19 Thread Marc Sturlese
ll of this. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/performance-sorting-multivalued-field-tp905943p907502.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: performance sorting multivalued field

2010-06-18 Thread Marc Sturlese
n3.nabble.com/performance-sorting-multivalued-field-tp905943p906115.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: performance sorting multivalued field

2010-06-18 Thread Ya-Wen Hsu
.hatc...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 10:32 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: performance sorting multivalued field do you mean sorting facets? or sorting search results? you can't sort search results by a multivalued field - which value would it use? Er

Re: performance sorting multivalued field

2010-06-18 Thread Erik Hatcher
rting? I have read in other threads how does it affect when faceting but couldn't find any info of the impact when sorting Thanks in advance -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/performance-sorting-multivalued-field-tp905943p905943.html Sent from the S

performance sorting multivalued field

2010-06-18 Thread Marc Sturlese
e.com/performance-sorting-multivalued-field-tp905943p905943.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.