On Nov 10, 2011, at 1:36 PM, Ken Krugler wrote:
>> : I see that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-653 removed this
>> : support from SolrJ, because it was deemed too dangerous for mere
>> : mortals.
That seems silly. It should just be well documented. At worst marked expert.
Yuck.
I
On Nov 7, 2011, at 12:06pm, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
> : I see that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-653 removed this
> : support from SolrJ, because it was deemed too dangerous for mere
> : mortals.
>
> I believe the concern was that the "novice level" API was very in your
> face
: I see that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-653 removed this
: support from SolrJ, because it was deemed too dangerous for mere
: mortals.
I believe the concern was that the "novice level" API was very in your
face about asking if you wanted to "overwrite" and made it too easy to
It should be supported in SolrJ, I'm surprised it's been lopped out.
Bulk indexing is extremely common.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Ken Krugler wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm working on improving the performance of the Solr scheme for Cascading.
>
> This supports generating a Solr index as the out
Hi list,
I'm working on improving the performance of the Solr scheme for Cascading.
This supports generating a Solr index as the output of a Hadoop job. We use
SolrJ to write the index locally (via EmbeddedSolrServer).
There are mentions of using overwrite=false with the CSV request handler, as
