Re: optimize is taking too much time

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Jay Hill wrote: > It's just that, in a > running system, it's probably very rare that there is only a single segment > for any meaningful length of time. Right - but the performance impact of a huge merge can be non-trivial. People wishing to avoid the biggest of

Re: optimize is taking too much time

Thanks for clearing that up guys, I misspoke slightly. It's just that, in a running system, it's probably very rare that there is only a single segment for any meaningful length of time. Unless that merge-down-to-one occurs right when indexing stops there will almost always be a new (small) segment

Re: optimize is taking too much time

Also, a mergefactor of 1 is actually invalid - 2 is the lowest you can go. -- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com

Re: optimize is taking too much time

On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 2:20 PM, David Smiley @MITRE.org wrote: > I've always thought that these two events were effectively equivalent.  -- > the results of an optimize vs the results of Lucene _naturally_ merging all > segments together into one. Correct. Occasionally one hit's a "major" merge

Re: optimize is taking too much time

merge down to. > > -Jay > ... > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/optimize-is-taking-too-much-time-tp27561570p27693177.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: optimize is taking too much time

- > > Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch > > Hadoop ecosystem search :: http://search-hadoop.com/ > > > > > > > > - Original Message > >> From: mklprasad > >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > >> Sent: Fri, February

Re: optimize is taking too much time

; From: mklprasad >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> Sent: Fri, February 19, 2010 1:02:11 AM >> Subject: Re: optimize is taking too much time >> >> >> >> >> Jagdish Vasani-2 wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > y

Re: optimize is taking too much time

2:11 AM > Subject: Re: optimize is taking too much time > > > > > Jagdish Vasani-2 wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > you should not optimize index after each insert of document.insted you > > should optimize it after inserting some good no of documents.

Re: optimize is taking too much time

emory and time >> >> >> can any body please tell do we have any property in solr to get rid of >> this. >> >> Thanks in advance >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://old.nabble.com/optimize-is-taking-too-much-time-tp2756157

Re: optimize is taking too much time

, From: Jagdish Vasani To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Thu, February 18, 2010 3:12:15 PM Subject: Re: optimize is taking too much time Hi, you should not optimize index after each insert of document.insted you should optimize it after inserting some good no

Re: optimize is taking too much time

; Thanks in advance > > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/optimize-is-taking-too-much-time-tp27561570p27561570.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >

Re: optimize is taking too much time

to call in that case for my 50Gb will it takes less time . > > > Please clearify me > Thanks in advance > > > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/optimize-is-taking-too-much-time-tp27561570p27634994.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: optimize is taking too much time

: in my solr u have 1,42,45,223 records having some 50GB . : Now when iam loading a new record and when its trying optimize the docs its : taking 2 much memory and time : can any body please tell do we have any property in solr to get rid of this. Solr isn't going to optimize the index unless y

optimize is taking too much time

context: http://old.nabble.com/optimize-is-taking-too-much-time-tp27561570p27561570.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.