al Message-
From: Burton-West, Tom [mailto:tburt...@umich.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 6:03 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: nfs vs sas in production
Hi Kallin,
Given the previous postings on the list about terrible NFS performance we were
pleasantly surprised when we did
Message-
From: Nagelberg, Kallin [mailto:knagelb...@globeandmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 4:13 PM
To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: nfs vs sas in production
Hey,
A question was raised during a meeting about our new Solr based search
projects. We're getting
earch :: http://search-lucene.com/
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: "Nagelberg, Kallin"
>> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
>> Sent: Tue, April 27, 2010 4:13:27 PM
>> Subject: nfs vs sas in production
>>
>> Hey,
riginal Message
> From: "Nagelberg, Kallin"
> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
> Sent: Tue, April 27, 2010 4:13:27 PM
> Subject: nfs vs sas in production
>
> Hey,
A question was raised during a meeting about our new Solr based
> search projects.
Hey,
A question was raised during a meeting about our new Solr based search
projects. We're getting 4 cutting edge servers each with something like 24 Gigs
of ram dedicated to search. However there is some problem with the amount of
SAS based storage each machine can handle, and people wonder i
