Re: need to support bi-directional synonyms

2012-02-23 Thread Jonathan Rochkind
et results for BOTH "sprayer" and "washer". and in the other direction if the user enters "washer" in the desc field - then they get results for BOTH "washer" and "sprayer". would i set up my synonym file like this? assuming expand = true.. sprayer => washer washer => sprayer thank you, mark -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/need-to-support-bi-directional-synonyms-tp3767990p3767990.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: need to support bi-directional synonyms

2012-02-22 Thread Bernd Fehling
i set up my synonym file like this? assuming expand = true.. sprayer => washer washer => sprayer thank you, mark -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/need-to-support-bi-directional-synonyms-tp3767990p3767990.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: need to support bi-directional synonyms

2012-02-22 Thread remi tassing
er => sprayer > > thank you, > mark > > -- > View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/need-to-support-bi-directional-synonyms-tp3767990p3767990.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

need to support bi-directional synonyms

2012-02-22 Thread geeky2
"washer" and "sprayer". would i set up my synonym file like this? assuming expand = true.. sprayer => washer washer => sprayer thank you, mark -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/need-to-support-bi-directional-synonyms-tp3767