p.
>
> Biff
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/need-best-solution-for-indexing-and-searching-multiple-related-database-tables-tp4009857p4011010.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
.nabble.com/need-best-solution-for-indexing-and-searching-multiple-related-database-tables-tp4009857p4011010.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/need-best-solution-for-indexing-and-searching-multiple-related-database-tables-tp4009857p4011007.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
s for your reply.
Biff
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/need-best-solution-for-indexing-and-searching-multiple-related-database-tables-tp4009857p4011007.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
6.n3.nabble.com/file/n4011006/consolidated_fields.jpg>
Biff
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/need-best-solution-for-indexing-and-searching-multiple-related-database-tables-tp4009857p4011006.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
n't leap before you think carefully.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Thomas J. Brennan
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 10:23 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: need best solution for indexing and searching multiple, related
database tables
I have a
one solr
core and it works better to just create a separate core just for that
schema.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/need-best-solution-for-indexing-and-searching-multiple-related-database-tables-tp4009857p4009879.html
Sent from the Solr - User mai
