Want to follow up on this...I suppose I need to file an issue?
From: tky...@hotmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Using multiple facet.prefix on same field with facet.threads
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 10:27:32 -0700
Sorry didn't format it correctly.. here is the output wi
223
84
303
3053
22
60
> From: tky...@hotmail.com
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Using multiple facet.prefix on same field with facet.threads
> Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 10:14:02 -0700
>
> Sure. I have a
15 key=ha15
facet.prefix=15=}attributes{!tag=ha15
df=attributes}"15=14"0231305312592121431412410861210841546312238430330532260
If I add facet.threads=2 I got:
08onid1index*:*2{!key=attrib}attributes{!ex=ha15 key=ha15
facet.prefix=15=}attributes{!tag=ha15
df=attributes}"15=14"0305322384303
Sounds like a bug. Can you paste an example request/response that can help
us reproduce the problem?
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Kenneth Yung wrote:
> Hi all:
> I'm using solr 4.7 and my application uses local param syntax to specify
> different facet.prefix on the same field. It works f
Hi all:
I'm using solr 4.7 and my application uses local param syntax to specify
different facet.prefix on the same field. It works fine without the
facet.threads parameter, but if I specify facets.threads then all the facet
count results have the same prefix even though I specify different pre
Hello All,
I am using solr 3.6 and I want to add multiple facet.prefix in single query.
I searched the forums but could not find the appropriate way.
what i want to do is something like this:
facet.prefix=(A OR B)
Please let me know how can i achieve this?
Thanks,
Nikhil.
--
View this
Never mind. I just realized the difference between the two. Sorry for the
noise.
Bill
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Bill Au wrote:
> There have been requests for supporting multiple facet.prefix for the same
> facet.field. There is an open JIRA with a patch:
>
There have been requests for supporting multiple facet.prefix for the same
facet.field. There is an open JIRA with a patch:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1351
Wouldn't using multiple facet.query achieve the same result? I mean
something like:
facet.query=lastName:A*&fa
