Re: mixing version of solr

2011-03-03 Thread Ofer Fort
we've been running like this for almost six months now and it's working ok. We have a post-commit event on the "master" that executes a commit call on the "slave", this forces the slave to reload the index. We started with a "standard" master/slave replication, but we had a few times that the slav

Re: mixing version of solr

2011-03-03 Thread Jonathan Rochkind
In general, no. I think there are index format changes between 1.4.1 and 4.0. If the two versions of Solr have the exact same index formats, it would theoretically work, but you'd need to figure that out and be sure of it, any two arbitrary versions of Solr/lucene may or may not have the exact

Re: mixing version of solr

2011-03-03 Thread Frederik Kraus
No, that won't work as the index format has changed. On Donnerstag, 3. März 2011 at 20:03, Ofer Fort wrote: > Hey all, > I have a master slave using the same index folder, the master only writes, > and the slave only reads. > Is it possible to use different versions of solr for those two servers?

mixing version of solr

2011-03-03 Thread Ofer Fort
Hey all, I have a master slave using the same index folder, the master only writes, and the slave only reads. Is it possible to use different versions of solr for those two servers? Let's say i want to gain from the improved search speed of solr4.0 but since it's my production system, am not willin