Well, a Solr index is just a bunch of files. So what I'd do is grab two
machines that are lying around (or even just one with two Solrs)
and try it.
You could just copy the whole Solr tree from your master to machine 1,
from your slave to machine 2. You'd have to change solrconfig on machine 2
to
On 1/27/2016 2:00 AM, Zaccheo Bagnati wrote:
> I apologize for connecting to this thread but I'm interested in this topic
> as well. I think we have a similar configuration: solr 4.8, standard
> master/slave replication, data is indexed on master and then replicated to
> slave. I'm investigating ho
Hi,
I apologize for connecting to this thread but I'm interested in this topic
as well. I think we have a similar configuration: solr 4.8, standard
master/slave replication, data is indexed on master and then replicated to
slave. I'm investigating how to migrate to solr 5.*.
Erick, you say that the
Yes and Yes. The developers try very hard to make Solr
one major release backwards compatible. So 5x should be
able to read 4x just fine.
Nothing has really changed in replication, so 5x supports
master/slave. It's just becoming less popular as SolrCloud
is significantly easier to operationalize.
I want migrate from solr 4.2.1 to 5.X version hten my question is
- can i use same snapshot of 4.2.1 in 5.x.x
Actually Indexing will take long time in my case then it would be possible
to do
or we should not do this.
next similar question is
- can we replicate 4.2.1 master to slave 5.x.x solr
