7;t know if this related to problem, but all our SOLR servers are
virtual servers.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/maxwarmingSearchers-and-memory-leak-tp4321937p4323509.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 2/26/2017 6:40 AM, SOLR4189 wrote:
> Shawn, you are right.
> * OS vendor and version
> CentosOS 6.5
>
> * Java vendor and version
> OpenJDK version 1.8.0_20
> OpenJDK 64-bit Server VM (build 25.20-b23)
>
> * Servlet container used to start Solr.
> Catalina(tomcat7)
>
> * Total amount of memory
ttp://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n4322362/20170226_102812.jpg>
* A screenshot showing total system memory allocations
<http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n4322362/20170226_102007.jpg>
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/maxwarmingSearchers-and
On 2/23/2017 1:51 AM, SOLR4189 wrote:
> We have maxwarmingSearchers set to 2 and field value cache set to
> initial size of 64. We saw that by taking a heap dump that our caches
> consume 70% of the heap size, by looking into the dump we saw that
> fieldValueCache has 6 o
We have maxwarmingSearchers set to 2 and field value cache set to initial
size of 64. We saw that by taking a heap dump that our caches consume 70% of
the heap size, by looking into the dump we saw that fieldValueCache has 6
occurences of org.apache.solr.util.concurrentCache.
When we have
I just realized I failed my own reading comprehension :)
You have maxDocs, not maxTime for hard commit. Please disregard.
On May 30, 2014, at 1:46 PM, Jason Hellman
wrote:
> I’m also not sure I understand the practical purpose of your hard/soft auto
> commit settings. You are stating the fo
I’m also not sure I understand the practical purpose of your hard/soft auto
commit settings. You are stating the following:
Every 10 seconds I want data written to disk, but not be searchable.
Every 15 seconds I want data to be written into memory and searchable.
I would consider whether your s
On 5/29/2014 9:55 PM, M, Arjun (NSN - IN/Bangalore) wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your nice explanation.. Now I understood the
> difference between autoCommit and autoSoftCommit.. Now my config looks like
> below.
>
>
>1
>false
>
>
>
>15000
>
>
>
hawn Heisey [mailto:s...@elyograg.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 10:14 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Error enquiry- exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=2
On 5/29/2014 7:52 AM, M, Arjun (NSN - IN/Bangalore) wrote:
> Thanks Shawn... Just one more question..
>
> Can bo
On 5/29/2014 7:52 AM, M, Arjun (NSN - IN/Bangalore) wrote:
> Thanks Shawn... Just one more question..
>
> Can both autoCommit and autoSoftCommit be enabled? If both are enabled, which
> one takes precedence?
Yes, and it's a very common configuration. If you do enable both, you
want openSearcher
M
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Error enquiry- exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=2
On 5/29/2014 4:18 AM, M, Arjun (NSN - IN/Bangalore) wrote:
> Thanks for your valuable inputs... Find below my code and config in
> solrconfig.xml. Index update is successful but I am n
On 5/29/2014 4:18 AM, M, Arjun (NSN - IN/Bangalore) wrote:
> Thanks for your valuable inputs... Find below my code and config in
> solrconfig.xml. Index update is successful but I am not able to see any data
> from solr admin console. What could be the issue? Any help here is highly
> appr
he.org
Subject: Re: Error enquiry- exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=2
On 5/28/2014 3:45 AM, M, Arjun (NSN - IN/Bangalore) wrote:
> Also is there a way to check if autowarming completed (or) how to make
> the next commit wait till previous commit finishes?
With Solr, probably no
On 5/28/2014 3:45 AM, M, Arjun (NSN - IN/Bangalore) wrote:
> Also is there a way to check if autowarming completed (or) how to make
> the next commit wait till previous commit finishes?
With Solr, probably not. There might be a statistic available from an
admin handler that I don't know ab
M
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Error enquiry- exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=2
> Hi,
>
> I am getting the below error.
>
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrServer$RemoteSolrException:
> Error opening new searcher. exceeded limit of
> m
> Hi,
>
> I am getting the below error.
>
> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrServer$RemoteSolrException:
> Error opening new searcher. exceeded limit of
> maxWarmingSearchers=2, try again later.
This error is usually a symptom of a problem, not the ac
Hi,
I am getting the below error.
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrServer$RemoteSolrException:
Error opening new searcher. exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=2, try again
later.
Can you please help?
gt;
>
>
>
> Can you help me why Iam getting this error.
>
> PFA of the same error log and the solr-spring.xml files.
>
> Regards,
> Lokanadham Ganta
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Erick Erickson [via Lucene]" <
> ml-node+s472066n4101220.
kanadham Ganta
- Original Message -
From: "Erick Erickson [via Lucene]"
To: "Loka"
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 7:14:26 PM
Subject: Re: exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers ERROR
That's a fine place to start. This form:
${solr.autoCommit.maxTime:15000}
j
ot;Erick Erickson [via Lucene]" <
> ml-node+s472066n4101203...@n3.nabble.com>
> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 6:33:20 PM
> Subject: Re: exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers ERROR
>
> Erickson,
>
> Thanks for your reply, before your reply, I have googled and found t
false
Is the above one fine?
Regards,
Lokanadham Ganta
- Original Message -
From: "Lokanadham Ganta"
To: "Erick Erickson [via Lucene]"
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 6:33:20 PM
Subject: Re: exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers ERROR
Erickson,
T
:
${solr.autoCommit.maxTime:15000}
false
${solr.autoSoftCommit.maxTime:1}
Please confirm me.
But how can I check how much autowarming that Iam doing, as of now I have set
the maxWarmingSearchers as 2, should I increase the value?
Regards,
Lokanadham Ganta
ing wrong.
>
> Regards,
> Lokanadham Ganta
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Erick Erickson [via Lucene]" <
> ml-node+s472066n4100924...@n3.nabble.com>
> To: "Loka"
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013
Erick Erickson [via Lucene]"
To: "Loka"
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 8:38:17 PM
Subject: Re: exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers ERROR
CommitWithin is either configured in solrconfig.xml for the
or tags as the maxTime tag. I
recommend you do use this.
The other way you ca
you help me how to use commitWithin Tag. can you give
> me the example
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/exceeded-limit-of-maxWarmingSearchers-ERROR-tp3252844p4100864.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Hi Naveen,
Iam also getting the similar problem where I do not know how to use the
commitWithin Tag, can you help me how to use commitWithin Tag. can you give
me the example
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/exceeded-limit-of-maxWarmingSearchers-ERROR
I ended up having to do a mathematical increase of the delay
because the indexing eventually would outstrip the static value I set and
crash the maxWarmingSearchers.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/exceeded-limit-of-maxWarmingSearchers-tp489803p4089699
ause the indexing eventually would outstrip the static value I set and
> crash the maxWarmingSearchers.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/exceeded-limit-of-maxWarmingSearchers-tp489803p4089699.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
*sleep 1.5 seconds* command per file
...FWIW I found in trying to cfindex 35K documents that if I did a
cfdirectory list and added a delay per file indexed (and a cfsetting with a
REALLY long timeout), CPU use dropped from 58% to ~19% and I got much
farther without the dread maxWarmingSearchers=4
ou are
> committing less often than that, or you'll quickly reach your
> maxWarmingSearchers config value. If the commits are happening VARY
> quickly, you may need to set autowarmCount to 0, and possibly disable caches
> entirely.
>
I see. This seems to be the opposite of the a
On 4/4/2013 12:34 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
In the case of maxWarmingSearchers, I would hope that you have your
system set up so that you would never need more than 1 warming searcher
at a time. If you do a commit while a previous commit is still warming,
Solr will try to create a second warming
default changing in new versions.
>
Thanks. This makes sense. I take it, then, that you update (or at
least review) solrconfig for each new Solr version. As I become more
familiar with that file I will begin doing the same.
> In the case of maxWarmingSearchers, I would hope that you have
y because many of the examples have
> been removed?
>
> In particular, I notice that there is no mention of
> maxWarmingSearchers in the Solr 4.1 solrconfig.xml. I assume that I
> can simply add it in, are there any other critical config options that
> are missing that I should
cular, I notice that there is no mention of
maxWarmingSearchers in the Solr 4.1 solrconfig.xml. I assume that I
can simply add it in, are there any other critical config options that
are missing that I should be looking into as well? Would I be better
off using the old Solr 3.x solrconfig.xml in Sol
13 at 12:54 PM, jimtronic wrote:
> The notes for maxWarmingSearchers in solrconfig.xml state:
>
> "Recommend values of 1-2 for read-only slaves, higher for masters w/o cache
> warming."
>
> Since solr cloud nodes could be both a leader and non-leader depending on
>
The notes for maxWarmingSearchers in solrconfig.xml state:
"Recommend values of 1-2 for read-only slaves, higher for masters w/o cache
warming."
Since solr cloud nodes could be both a leader and non-leader depending on
the current state of the cloud, what would be the optimal se
Hi Nagendra,
Thanks a lot .. i will start working on NRT today.. meanwhile old settings
(increased warmSearcher in Master) have not given me trouble till now ..
but NRT will be more suitable to us ... Will work on that one and will
analyze the performance and share with you.
Thanks
Naveen
2011/
Naveen:
See below:
*NRT with Apache Solr 3.3 and RankingAlgorithm does need a commit for a
document to become searchable*. Any document that you add through update
becomes immediately searchable. So no need to commit from within your
update client code. Since there is no commit, the cache does
Nagendra
You wrote,
Naveen:
*NRT with Apache Solr 3.3 and RankingAlgorithm does need a commit for a
document to become searchable*. Any document that you add through update
becomes immediately searchable. So no need to commit from within your
update client code. Since there is no commit, the c
Bill:
I did look at Marks performance tests. Looks very interesting.
Here is the Apacle Solr 3.3 with RankingAlgorithm NRT performance:
http://solr-ra.tgels.com/wiki/en/Near_Real_Time_Search_ver_3.x
Regards
- Nagendra Nagarajayya
http://solr-ra.tgels.org
http://rankingalgorithm.tgels.org
On
I understand.
Have you looked at Mark's patch? From his performance tests, it looks
pretty good.
When would RA work better?
Bill
On 8/14/11 8:40 PM, "Nagendra Nagarajayya"
wrote:
>Bill:
>
>The technical details of the NRT implementation in Apache Solr with
>RankingAlgorithm (SOLR-RA) is avai
Bill:
The technical details of the NRT implementation in Apache Solr with
RankingAlgorithm (SOLR-RA) is available here:
http://solr-ra.tgels.com/papers/NRT_Solr_RankingAlgorithm.pdf
(Some changes for Solr 3.x, but for most it is as above)
Regarding support for 4.0 trunk, should happen someti
OK,
I'll ask the elephant in the room.
What is the difference between the new UpdateHandler from Mark and the
SOLR-RA?
The UpdateHandler works with 4.0 does SOLR-RA work with 4.0 trunk?
Pros/Cons?
On 8/14/11 8:10 PM, "Nagendra Nagarajayya"
wrote:
>Naveen:
>
>NRT with Apache Solr 3.3 and Ra
Naveen:
NRT with Apache Solr 3.3 and RankingAlgorithm does need a commit for a
document to become searchable. Any document that you add through update
becomes immediately searchable. So no need to commit from within your
update client code. Since there is no commit, the cache does not have
what is the solution for our problem?
>
> We are using CURL to post the data and commit
>
> Also till now we are using default solrconfig.
>
> Aug 14, 2011 12:12:04 AM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
> SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error opening new searche
It's somewhat confusing - I'll straighten it out though. I left the issue open
to keep me from taking forever to doc it - hasn't helped much yet - but maybe
later today...
On Aug 14, 2011, at 12:12 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Ah, thanks, Mark... I must have been looking at the wrong JIRAs.
>
>
Hi Mark/Erick/Nagendra,
I was not very confident about NRT at that point of time, when we started
project almost 1 year ago, definitely i would try NRT and see the
performance.
The current requirement was working fine till we were using commitWithin 10
millisecs in the XMLDocument which we were p
Ah, thanks, Mark... I must have been looking at the wrong JIRAs.
Erick
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> On Aug 14, 2011, at 9:03 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
>
>> You either have to go to near real time (NRT), which is under
>> development, but not committed to trunk yet
>
>
till now we are using default solrconfig.
Aug 14, 2011 12:12:04 AM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error opening new searcher.
exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=2, try again later.
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.getSearcher
On Aug 14, 2011, at 9:03 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> You either have to go to near real time (NRT), which is under
> development, but not committed to trunk yet
NRT support is committed to trunk.
- Mark Miller
lucidimagination.com
> SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error opening new searcher.
> exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=2, try again later.
> at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.getSearcher(SolrCore.java:1052)
> at
> org.apache.solr.update.DirectUpdateHandler2.commit(
using CURL to post the data and commit
Also till now we are using default solrconfig.
Aug 14, 2011 12:12:04 AM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error opening new searcher.
exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=2, try again later.
at
r1 for Search-Requests - commit every Minute - 5GB Xmx
- Solr2 for Update-Request - delta every Minute - 4GB Xmx
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/exceeded-limit-of-maxWarmingSearchers-4-tp2810380p2810572.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-of-maxWarmingSearchers-4-tp2810380p2810561.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.000
- Solr1 for Search-Requests - commit every Minute - 5GB Xmx
- Solr2 for Update-Request - delta every Minute - 4GB Xmx
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/exceeded-limit-of-maxWarmingSearchers-4-tp2810380p2810458.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
stances, 7 Cores,
1 Core with 31 Million Documents other Cores < 100.000
- Solr1 for Search-Requests - commit every Minute - 5GB Xmx
- Solr2 for Update-Request - delta every Minute - 4GB Xmx
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/exceeded-limit-of-maxWarmingSearch
Hi Erik,
I didn't look at the source code, and I think the javadoc for SUSS doesn't
mention it, but I am under the impression that the number of threads to use
should roughly match the number of CPU cores on the master. The
maxWarmingSearchers should only be relevant to slaves, n
My application updates the master index frequently, sometimes very frequently.
Is there a good rule of thumb for configuring:
1) maxWarmingSearchers in the master
2) the SUSS thread pool size (and perhaps queue length) to match the server
settings?
gt; Solr didn't complian when the number of test threads is 1, 2, 3 or 4.
>
> But when I increased the thnumber of test threads to 8, I saw this error
> on the console:
>
> SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error opening new searcher.
> exceeded limit of maxWarmin
s 1, 2, 3 or 4.
But when I increased the thnumber of test threads to 8, I saw this error
on the console:
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error opening new searcher.
exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=2, try again later.
What does this mean?
Why Solr tries to make warm u
Hi Shalin,
Which auto-warming I have to remove to make commits faster. The below
configuration have in solrconfig.xml. Also, what is maxWarmingSearchers value.
Thanks for your help!!
Thanks & Regards,
Mahendra
--- On Mon, 2/23/09, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
econd instance start. This is causing the below error.
>
> org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error opening new searcher. exceeded
> limit of maxWarmingSearchers=2, try again later.
> Error opening new searcher. exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=2, try
> again later.
&g
rcher. exceeded
limit of maxWarmingSearchers=2, try again later.
Error opening new searcher. exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=2, try again
later.
Is there any configuration parameter to increase maxWarmingSearchers.
Any help would appriciate !!
Thanks & Regards,
Mahendra
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
I'd say: "Make sure you don't commit more frequently than the time it takes for your
searcher to warm up", or else you risk searcher overlap and pile-up.
cool. i found a place in our code where we were committing the same
thing twice in very rapid succession. fingers
ukman
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2009 11:36:13 AM
Subject: Re: exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> Jon,
>
> If you can, don't commit on every update and that should help or fully solve
> your problem.
is there any sort of
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Jon,
If you can, don't commit on every update and that should help or fully solve
your problem.
is there any sort of heuristic or formula i can apply that can tell me
when to commit? put it in a cron job and fire it once per hour?
there are certain updates that are
009 1:09:00 PM
> Subject: Re: exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers
>
> Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> > That should be fine (but apparently isn't), as long as you don't have some
> very slow machine or if your caches are are large and configured to copy a
> lot
>
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
That should be fine (but apparently isn't), as long as you don't have some very
slow machine or if your caches are are large and configured to copy a lot of
data on commit.
this is becoming more and more problematic. we have periods where we
get 10 of these exceptio
: Jon Drukman
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 4:54:06 PM
> Subject: Re: exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers
>
> Yonik Seeley wrote:
> > I'd advise setting it to a very low limit (like 2) and committing less
> > often. Once you ge
Yonik Seeley wrote:
I'd advise setting it to a very low limit (like 2) and committing less
often. Once you get too many overlapping searchers, things will slow
to a crawl and that will just cause more to pile up.
The root cause is simply too many commits in conjunction with warming
too long. I
t;
> SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error opening new searcher.
> exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=16, try again later.
>
> I keep bumping up maxWarmingSearchers. It's at 32 now. Is there any way to
> figure out what the "right" value is besides t
I am getting hit by a storm of these once a day or so:
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error opening new
searcher. exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=16, try again later.
I keep bumping up maxWarmingSearchers. It's at 32 now. Is there any
way to figure out what the &
commited; there is no actual commit operation.
-Original Message-
From: Walter Underwood [mailto:wunderw...@netflix.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 11:45 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=4
It sounds like you need real-time search
oad, we see the following error...
ERROR [IndexSubscription] error committing changes to solr
java.lang.RuntimeException: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error
opening new searcher. exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=4, try again
later.
My understanding of Solr¹s caches and warming searches
ee the following error...
>
> ERROR [IndexSubscription] error committing changes to solr
> java.lang.RuntimeException: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error
> opening new searcher. exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=4, try again
> later.
>
> My understanding of Solr¹s cac
will not be part of the
query results.
> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:09:47 -0500
> From: markrmil...@gmail.com
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=4
>
> chip correra wrote:
> > We’re using Solr as a backend indexe
update the user’s
interface. Occasionally, usually under load, we see the following error...
ERROR [IndexSubscription] error committing changes to solr
java.lang.RuntimeException: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error opening
new searcher. exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=4, try
interface. Occasionally, usually under load, we see the following error...
ERROR [IndexSubscription] error committing changes to solr
java.lang.RuntimeException: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error opening
new searcher. exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=4, try again later.
My
er 1, 2008 4:23:47 PM
> Subject: RE: maxWarmingSearchers
>
>
> Hi ToddFeak,
>
> thanks for your response...
>
> solr version is 1.3. Roughly about every 4 minutes there are indexing/updaing
> of
> 4 to 10 documents that is from multiple clients to one master
thanks for your explanation and time :)
> Subject: RE: maxWarmingSearchers
> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:57:59 -0800
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> The commit after each one may be hurting you.
>
> I believe that a new searcher is c
iming information on how long it took for the
searcher and caches to warm up.
-Todd Feak
-Original Message-
From: dudes dudes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 1:46 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: maxWarmingSearchers
> Subject: RE: maxWarmingS
> Subject: RE: maxWarmingSearchers
> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:35:53 -0800
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> Ok sounds reasonable. When you index/update those 4-10 documents, are
> you doing a single commit? OR are you doing a commit after eac
]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 1:24 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: maxWarmingSearchers
Hi ToddFeak,
thanks for your response...
solr version is 1.3. Roughly about every 4 minutes there are
indexing/updaing of 4 to 10 documents that is from multiple clients
to one master
uncommented under solrconfig ... QueryCache and FilterCache
settings are left as default
thanks
ak
> Subject: RE: maxWarmingSearchers
> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:13:15 -0800
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> Probably going to need a bi
searchers probably
won't fix the issue, just delay it.
-ToddFeak
-Original Message-
From: dudes dudes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 12:13 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: maxWarmingSearchers
Hello all,
I'm having this issue and I hope I get
Hello all,
I'm having this issue and I hope I get some help.. :)
This following happens quite often ... even though searching and indexing are
on a safe side...
SolrException: HTTP code=503, reason=Error opening new searcher. exceeded
limit of maxWarmingSearchers=4, try again late
: SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error opening new searcher.
: exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=8, try again later.
: Our server is not even in public use yet, it's serving maybe one query every
: second, or less. I don't understand what could be causing this.
th
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 2:46 AM, Jon Drukman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Most of them say warmupTime=0. It ranges from 0 to 37. I hope that is
> msec and not seconds!!
>
Correct, that is in milliseconds.
--
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
Feak, Todd wrote:
Have you looked at how long your warm up is taking?
If it's taking longer to warm up a searcher then it does for you to do
an update, you will be behind the curve and eventually run into this no
matter how big that number.
Most of them say warmupTime=0. It ranges from 0 to
D] On Behalf Of Jon Drukman
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 11:56 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers
I am getting this error quite frequently on my Solr installation:
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error opening new
searcher. exceeded lim
I am getting this error quite frequently on my Solr installation:
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error opening new
searcher. exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=8, try again later.
I've done some googling but the common explanation of it being related
to autocommit do
: and I though a true master-slave setup would be overkill. Is it really
: problematic to run queries on instances that aren't auto-warmed? Sounds like
it really depends on your usecases and what you consider "problematic" ...
there's no inherent problem in having queries hit an unwarmed index, i
Thanks for the advice. Unfortunately, my plan was to two have two instances
both running as "masters" although one would only be a warm-standby for
querying purposes. I just wanted a little bit of redundancy for the moment
and I though a true master-slave setup would be overkill. Is it really
probl
: On a solr instance where I am in the process of indexing moderately large
: number of documents (300K+). There is no querying of the index taking place
: at all.
: I don't understand what operations are causing new searchers to warm, or how
: to stop them from doing so. I'd be happy to provide
On May 9, 2008, at 7:33 PM, Sasha Voynow wrote:
Is it generally better to handle
batching your commits programmatically on the "client" side rather
than
relying on auto-commit?
the time based auto-commit is useful if you are indexing from multiple
clients to a single server. Rather then
r - Nutch
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> > From: Sasha Voynow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Sent: Friday, May 9, 2008 6:59:00 PM
> > Subject: exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers
> >
> > Hi:
> >
> > I&#
t; From: Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, May 9, 2008 7:18:03 PM
> Subject: Re: exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers
>
> Sasha,
>
> Do you have postCommit or postOptimize hooks enabled? Are you sending
> commits
&
t; Sent: Friday, May 9, 2008 6:59:00 PM
> Subject: exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers
>
> Hi:
>
> I'm getting flurries of these error messages:
>
>
>
> WARNING: Error opening new searcher. exceeded limit of
> maxWarmingSearchers=4, try again later.
>
>
Hi:
I'm getting flurries of these error messages:
WARNING: Error opening new searcher. exceeded limit of
maxWarmingSearchers=4, try again later.
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error opening new searcher.
exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=4, try again later.
On a
99 matches
Mail list logo
