Hi Vincenco,
Since it is about boosting, you might also take a look at edismax and pf2 and
pf3 fields. It also supports slop (ps2 and ps3).
HTH,
Emir
--
Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection
Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/
> On 5 Nov
This _particular_ use case might be a good candidate for shingles.
That filter pairs up tuples into tokens, so your docs would have
A_B
A_C
A_C
B_D
and the search would be broken up (assuming the appropriate parameters
to ShingleFilterFacotry) to
X_A A_B B_Y
thus would match the specified doc only
Thanks Erick.
Right, if there is no slop specified it is like have an "exact match". So I
can simplify the query in:
bq=field1:("X A" OR "A B" OR "B Y")^10
I'm struggling to understand if there is any way to split the user query in
pairs directly with solr.
> On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 6:32 PM
Looks good to me. The only thing I'd mention is that in the example
given, complexprhase query is unnecessary, but only because there's no
"slop" specified. If by "near" you can also mean "within 3 words" or
some such, then you need complexPhraseQuery..
FWIW,
Erick
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 10:12 AM
Hi,
I have a field field1 where there are only pairs of terms, for example the
documents
doc1 { field1 : "A B", title : "Hello title 1" }
doc2 { field1 : "A C", title : "Hello title 2" }
doc3 { field1 : "A D", title : "Hello title 3" }
doc4 { field1 : "B D", title : "Hello title 4" }
I have t
