ery
> cache.
>
> What do you think? Thanks,
>
>
> Carole
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/logical-relation-among-filter-queries-tp2649142p2651639.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
using OR) and using normal solr query
instead? At least solr query cache is lighter weighted than filter query
cache.
What do you think? Thanks,
Carole
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/logical-relation-among-filter-queries-tp2649142p2651639.html
Sent from the
f the values out of
> the same field, rating. Therefore, i thought if the logical relation among
> filter query is OR, it will control the number of distinct cache to be
> distinct number of rating value.
>
>
> Does it matter?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
&g
refore, i thought if the logical relation among
filter query is OR, it will control the number of distinct cache to be
distinct number of rating value.
Does it matter?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/logical-relation-among-filter-queries-tp2649142p2649904.
you can use the boolean operators in the filter query.
e.g. fq=rating:(PG-13 OR R)
Regards,
Jayendra
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:25 PM, cyang2010 wrote:
> I wonder what is the logical relation among filter queries. I can't find
> much documentation on filter query.
>
> for ex
I wonder what is the logical relation among filter queries. I can't find
much documentation on filter query.
for example, i want to find all titles that is either PG-13 or R through
filter query. The following query won't give me any result back. So I
suppose by default it is in
