also probably a point to consider, the index has about 2.9 million records
in total
-Original Message-
From: Sandeep Shetty
Sent: 28 September 2007 17:15
To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: RE: locallucene former custom-sort thread
yes i was thinking abt the sam
Message-
From: patrick o'leary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 September 2007 17:02
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: locallucene former custom-sort thread
That's the latest. I was experimenting with caching, which might be the
problem.
I'll have a look, could
t zip file
solr-example_s1.3_ls0.2.tgz
is there a newer version available?
Thanks!
Sandeep
-Original Message-
From: patrick o'leary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 September 2007 16:08
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: locallucene former custom-sort thread
Changing thread
rg
Subject: locallucene former custom-sort thread
Changing thread name;
Are you using local lucene or local solr, and which version?
P
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i have been testing locallucene with our data for the last couple of days.
> one issue i faced with it is during when using geo sorting
Changing thread name;
Are you using local lucene or local solr, and which version?
P
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have been testing locallucene with our data for the last couple of days.
one issue i faced with it is during when using geo sorting is that it seems
to eat up all the memory
