, use a
sub-entity to pull the "many" rows for each parent row.
thx
mark
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/large-text-blobs-in-string-field-tp4017882p4018355.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> multi-valued field?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/large-text-blobs-in-string-field-tp4017882p4018335.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
On 5 November 2012 22:26, geeky2 wrote:
> Gora,
>
> currently our core does use mult-valued fields. however the exsiting
> multi-valued fields in the schema are will only result in 3 - 10 values.
>
> we are thinking of using the text blob approach primarily because of the
> large number of possib
.n3.nabble.com/large-text-blobs-in-string-field-tp4017882p4018315.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 3 November 2012 00:45, geeky2 wrote:
[...]
>
> we are thinking of doing this to represent a 1:M relationship with the
> "Many" being represented as a string in the schema (probably comprised
> either of xml or json objects).
>
> we are looking at the classic part : model scenario, where the cl
could be 400+ model
numbers.
thx
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/large-text-blobs-in-string-field-tp4017882.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.