Re: json.facet without a facet ...

2016-09-27 Thread Bram Van Dam
On 26/09/16 17:06, Yonik Seeley wrote: > Statistics are now fully integrated into faceting. Since we start off > with a single facet bucket with a domain defined by the main query and > filters, we can even ask for statistics for this top level bucket, > before breaking up into further buckets via

Re: json.facet without a facet ...

2016-09-26 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Bram Van Dam wrote: > Howdy, > > I realize that this might be a strange question, so please bear with me > here. > > I've been replacing my usage of the old Stats Component (stats=true, > stats.field=foo, [stats.facet=bar]) with the new json.facet sugar. This > has

json.facet without a facet ...

2016-09-26 Thread Bram Van Dam
Howdy, I realize that this might be a strange question, so please bear with me here. I've been replacing my usage of the old Stats Component (stats=true, stats.field=foo, [stats.facet=bar]) with the new json.facet sugar. This has been a great improvement on all fronts. However, with the stats co