This probably carried forward from a very old version organically. I
am running 7.7
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 6:25 PM Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> What version of Solr are you using? ‘cause 8x has this definition for
> _version_
>
>
>
>
> and I find no text like you’re seeing in any schema file i
What version of Solr are you using? ‘cause 8x has this definition for _version_
and I find no text like you’re seeing in any schema file in 8x….
So with a prior version, “try it and see”? See:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9449 and linked JIRAs,
the _version_ can be indexed=“fal
Yes but "the _version_ field is also a non-indexed, non-stored single
valued docValues field;" <- is that a problem?
My schema has this:
I don't know if I use the updateLog or not. How can I find out?
I think that would work for me as I could just make a dynamic fild like:
---
Yes it i
Have you seen “In-place updates”?
See:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/updating-parts-of-documents.html
Then use the field as part of a function query. Since it’s non-indexed, you
won’t be searching on it. That said, you can do a lot with function queries
to satisfy use-cases.
Best.
Er
I have hit a bit of a cross-road with our usage of solr where I want
to include some slightly dynamic data.
I want to ask solr to find things like "text query" but only if they
meet some specific criteria. When I have all of those criteria
indexed, everything works great. (text contains "apples"
