Re: Incremental update, of a sort

2013-08-02 Thread Marc Brette
; > > > Very good pointer anyway, I'll keep that in mind > > > > > > > > On Friday, August 2, 2013, Michael Della Bitta wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Marc, > > > > > > > > > > Have you considered using ExternalFi

Re: Incremental update, of a sort

2013-08-02 Thread Mikhail Khludnev
> > Very good pointer anyway, I'll keep that in mind > > > > > > On Friday, August 2, 2013, Michael Della Bitta wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Marc, > > > > > > > > Have you considered using ExternalFileField for this? > > > > On Aug 2,

Re: Incremental update, of a sort

2013-08-02 Thread Marc Brette
13, Michael Della Bitta wrote: > > > > > Hi Marc, > > > > > > Have you considered using ExternalFileField for this? > > > On Aug 2, 2013 11:54 AM, "Marc Brette" > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > >

Re: Incremental update, of a sort

2013-08-02 Thread Michael Della Bitta
; > index, without re-indexing the documents. > > > > > > I know Solr supports 'Atomic Update', but this is no a real incremental > > > update of a document: it costs as much as re-indexing the document (and > > > require to store the document). > > >

Re: Incremental update, of a sort

2013-08-02 Thread Marc Brette
te: > > > Hi, > > I would like to completely populate a field for all the documents in the > > index, without re-indexing the documents. > > > > I know Solr supports 'Atomic Update', but this is no a real incremental > > update of a document: i

Re: Incremental update, of a sort

2013-08-02 Thread Michael Della Bitta
omic Update', but this is no a real incremental > update of a document: it costs as much as re-indexing the document (and > require to store the document). > As Solr does not support a real incremental update, I wondered if that > would be easier to completely re-populate a field

Incremental update, of a sort

2013-08-02 Thread Marc Brette
Hi, I would like to completely populate a field for all the documents in the index, without re-indexing the documents. I know Solr supports 'Atomic Update', but this is no a real incremental update of a document: it costs as much as re-indexing the document (and require to store the doc

Re: Incremental Update of index

2012-12-05 Thread Gora Mohanty
On 6 December 2012 11:13, Amit Jha wrote: > Thanks Sandeep, > > How can it done when using a database because database has all the records > old, new and updated. You need to do a delta-import: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#Using_delta-import_command Regards, Gora

Re: Incremental Update of index

2012-12-05 Thread Amit Jha
Thanks Sandeep, How can it done when using a database because database has all the records old, new and updated. On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Sandeep Mestry wrote: > Hi Amit/Shanu, > > You can create the solr document for only the updated record and index it > to ensure only the updated rec

Re: Incremental Update of index

2012-12-05 Thread Sandeep Mestry
Hi Amit/Shanu, You can create the solr document for only the updated record and index it to ensure only the updated record gets indexed. You need not rebuild indexes from scratch for every record update. Thanks, Sandeep

Re: incremental update

2008-12-31 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Is it possible to incrementally index given document? Meaning, I would : like to index filed with large size separate request so that even if it : fails I would have basic document indexed. if i'm understanding your question, you mean you want to be able to send seperate requests to index vari

incremental update

2008-12-17 Thread Dalvi, Rajesh
Hi, Is it possible to incrementally index given document? Meaning, I would like to index filed with large size separate request so that even if it fails I would have basic document indexed. Thanks, Rajesh