Re: improving search response time

2010-12-21 Thread Anurag
entire index into RAM for incredible speed. Once you get > above 4GB RAM, it's best if you run a 64-bit OS and Java, which requires > 64-bit processors. If your index is growing, you might want to have > more memory than that. > > Shawn > > > > --

Re: improving search response time

2010-12-21 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 12/21/2010 3:02 AM, Anurag wrote: I am using spellchecker in the query part. Now my search time has become more. say initiallly it was 1000ms now its 3000ms.I have data index of size 9GB. My query http://localhost:8983/solr/spellCheckCompRH/?q= http://localhost:8983/solr/spellCheckCompRH/?q="+

Re: improving search response time

2010-12-21 Thread Anurag
context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/improving-search-response-time-tp1204491p2125220.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: improving search response time

2010-08-19 Thread Jan Høydahl / Cominvent
SD hard > drive? > > Thanks, > -Muneeb > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/improving-search-response-time-tp1204491p1226372.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: improving search response time

2010-08-19 Thread Muneeb Ali
/DRAM storage... Is anyone using SSDs for solr application? What would be a better route to take? more memory or flash based SSD hard drive? Thanks, -Muneeb -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/improving-search-response-time-tp1204491p1226372.html Sent from the Solr

Re: improving search response time

2010-08-18 Thread Lance Norskog
More on this: you should give Solr enough memory to run comfortably, then stop. Leave as much as you can for the OS to manage its disk cache. The OS is better at this than Solr is. Also, it does not have to do garbage collection. Filter queries are a big help. You should create a set of your basic

Re: improving search response time

2010-08-18 Thread Shawn Heisey
Most of your time is spent doing the query itself, which in the light of other information provided, does not surprise me. With 12GB of RAM and 9GB dedicated to the java heap, the available RAM for disk caching is pretty low, especially if Solr is actually using all 9GB. Since your index is

Re: improving search response time

2010-08-18 Thread Muneeb Ali
=161.46207100162033) 2.0 = boost 8.5721357E-4 = queryNorm DisMaxQParser − − sum(readerScore)^2 sum(yearScore)^1.1 − 5468.0 − 1.0 − 1.0 − 0.0 − 0.0 − 0.0 − 0.0 − 0.0 − 0.0 − 5467.0 − 4734.0 − 0.0 − 0.0 − 231.0 − 0.0 − 0.0 − 501.0 = Thanks for your help. -Muneeb -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/improving-search-response-time-tp1204491p1207596.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: improving search response time

2010-08-18 Thread Gora Mohanty
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 05:18:34 -0700 (PDT) Muneeb Ali wrote: > > Hi All, > > I need some guidance over improving search response time for our > catalog search. [...] > I would appreciate if anyone with similar background could shed > some light on upgrading hardware in our

Re: improving search response time

2010-08-18 Thread Jan Høydahl / Cominvent
4.18, Muneeb Ali wrote: > > Hi All, > > I need some guidance over improving search response time for our catalog > search. we are using solr 1.4.0 version and have master/slave setup (3 > dedicated servers, one being the master and other two slaves). The server > specs are as follo

improving search response time

2010-08-18 Thread Muneeb Ali
Hi All, I need some guidance over improving search response time for our catalog search. we are using solr 1.4.0 version and have master/slave setup (3 dedicated servers, one being the master and other two slaves). The server specs are as follows: Quad Core 2.5Ghz 1333mhz 12GB Ram 2x250GB