For your first question, wouldn't it be possible to achieve that with some
simple boolean logic? I mean, if you have a requirement to match any of the
other fields AND description2, but not if it ONLY matches description 2:
say matching x against field A, B, and description 2:
((A:x OR B:x) AND de
thx, but im not sure that covers all edge cases, to clarify
1. matching description2 is okay if other fields are matched too, but
results matching only to description2 should be omitted
2. its okay to not match against the people field, but matches against
the people field should only be phrase ma
On Jan 11, 2010, at 12:56 PM, Joe Calderon wrote:
1. given a set of fields how to return matches that match across them
but not just one specific one, ex im using a dismax parser currently
but i want to exclude any results that only match against a field
called 'description2'
One way could be
hello *, im looking for help on writing queries to implement a few
business rules.
1. given a set of fields how to return matches that match across them
but not just one specific one, ex im using a dismax parser currently
but i want to exclude any results that only match against a field
called 'd