Hi Antoine,
We didn't use grouping. We didn't try to reorder millions of documents
because that would mean they would all need to first read from disk/cache,
then reordered, and then returned, which would be slooow. We did get more
docs than we needed because in our case our goal was to diversify
Otis,
Can you give more details on this ? Sounds interesting to me. What about if
you are trying to re-order millions of Lucene documents ? Did you use
grouping first ?
Antoine.
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've done something
Hi,
We've done something very similar to this before. We implemented it as a
custom SearchComponent with a pluggable hit (re)ordering mechanism.
Otis
--
SOLR Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html
Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
On Thu,
If you want that exact circular result I think the only option is to have
an extra field, pre calculated (according to these needs, for example,
incrementing a value for each document for the same artist or something
like that) and sort on that field.
If what you need is to show the artists, maybe
actually, I have as schema albums with
artist / album_name / album_description
When I made a search without query the result is (having the some score) :
artist A
artist A
artist A
artist B
artist B
artist B
artist C
artist C
=> depends on my indexing process
what I want as result :
artist A
arti
What do you mean? Could you explain your use case?
Tomás
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 9:36 AM, nihed mbarek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to define a custom search for a fieldType on a schema ? ?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
>
> M'BAREK Med Nihed
>
