RE: field space consumption - stored vs not stored

2013-01-31 Thread Petersen, Robert
0001 130 1010 0001 ... 16,383 0111 16,384 1000 1000 0001 16,385 1001 1000 0001 ... -Original Message- From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:s...@elyograg.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 5:28 PM Cc: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re

Re: field space consumption - stored vs not stored

2013-01-30 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 1/30/2013 6:24 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: If I had to guess about the extra space required for storing an int field, I would say it's in the neighborhood of 20 bytes per document, perhaps less. I am also interested in a definitive answer. The answer is very likely less than 20 bytes per doc.

Re: field space consumption - stored vs not stored

2013-01-30 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 1/30/2013 6:04 PM, Petersen, Robert wrote: Hi Just a quick question: for a single valued int field in solr 3.6.1 how much more space is used if the field is stored vs indexed and not stored? Here is the index file format reference for the two files that make up stored fields in the 3.6 i