>I can't think of any value add in having Solr keep track of the fact
that
>"ds" means "Download Speed" vs having an external data mapping keep
track
>of that information, since direct access to that info inside of Solr
>wouldn't typically make the performance of requests any faster or
>reduce the
This would require some storage when the index is built to map between the
internal field name and the "display name" ... since this is not a Lucene
concept it would have to be a higher level concept hat Solr write to disk
directly -- there are currently no concepts like this but that doens't
mean
use problems.
It seems to work just fine.
- Original Message
From: Will Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 1:48:22 PM
Subject: RE: field display values
I would normally agree but the problem is that I'm making very heav
ucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: field display values
Will Johnson wrote:
> Has anyone done anything interesting to preserve display values for
> field names. Ie my users would like to see
>
> Download Speed (MB/sec): 5
>
> As opposed to:
>
> ds:5
>
>
The g
Will Johnson wrote:
Has anyone done anything interesting to preserve display values for
field names. Ie my users would like to see
Download Speed (MB/sec): 5
As opposed to:
ds:5
The general model has been to think of solr like SQL... it is only the
database - display choices should be
Has anyone done anything interesting to preserve display values for
field names. Ie my users would like to see
Download Speed (MB/sec): 5
As opposed to:
ds:5
there are options for doing fancy encoding of field names but those seem
less that ideal. What I'd really like to do is at
