Re: feature of FST version of SynonymFilter affects Highlighter

2011-12-26 Thread Robert Muir
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote: > I don't have JUnit test case. What I tried was: > > I have indexing time synonym definition: > > nhl, national hockey league > > and I indexed "I like national hockey league". > > Then I searched nhl with hl=on, I got an unwanted highlight

Re: feature of FST version of SynonymFilter affects Highlighter

2011-12-26 Thread Koji Sekiguchi
(11/12/26 23:58), Robert Muir wrote: The old one didn't really handle this correctly either. Sorry, I jumped the gun! I should say offsets, not positions! So please ignore what I quoted in javadoc in my previous mail, sorry! Koji, what is the highlighting problem? Can we have a test case? I

Re: feature of FST version of SynonymFilter affects Highlighter

2011-12-26 Thread Robert Muir
The old one didn't really handle this correctly either. Koji, what is the highlighting problem? Can we have a test case? 2011/12/26 Koji Sekiguchi : > I found that SynonymFilter javadoc says: > > "Matches single or multi word synonyms in a token stream. > This token stream cannot properly handle

feature of FST version of SynonymFilter affects Highlighter

2011-12-26 Thread Koji Sekiguchi
I found that SynonymFilter javadoc says: "Matches single or multi word synonyms in a token stream. This token stream cannot properly handle position increments != 1" I think due to the feature, Highlighter doesn't work properly in some cases: http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/c3ed1