Re: solr Facet.contains

2017-09-18 Thread vobium
help me sove this problem -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

Re: solr Facet.contains

2017-09-15 Thread vobium
the field type=string when I don't filter facets my query without filter for facet is facet.field="all_data" that time get o/p like this India/maha/mumbai (2) India/gujarat/badoda (1) India/goa/xyz (1) India/raj/jaypur (1) 1236/maha/890 (1) India/maha/kolhapur (1) India/maha

Re: solr Facet.contains

2017-09-15 Thread Michael Kuhlmann
> India/maha/mumbai (2) > India/maha/kolhapur(1) > India/maha/nashik(1) > 1236/maha/890(1) > > I tried it by using facet.contains but it is not working > so plz give solution for this issue > > > > -- > Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

solr Facet.contains

2017-09-15 Thread vobium
India/raj/jaypur 1236/maha/890~India/maha/kolhapur India/maha/mumbai India/maha/nashik Uk/Abc/Cde Expected facet Data that contain maha as substring o/p India/maha/mumbai (2) India/maha/kolhapur(1) India/maha/nashik(1) 1236/maha/890(1) I tried it by using facet.contains but it is not work

solr Facet.contains

2017-09-15 Thread vobium
India/raj/jaypur India/maha/kolhapur India/maha/mumbai India/maha/nashik Expected facet Data that contain *maha *as substring o/p India/maha/mumbai (2) India/maha/kolhapur(1) India/maha/nashik(1) I tried it by using facet.contains but it is not working so plz give solution for this issue

solr Facet.contains

2017-09-15 Thread vobium
India/raj/jaypur India/maha/kolhapur India/maha/mumbai India/maha/nashik Expected facet Data that contain maha as substring o/p India/maha/mumbai (2) India/maha/kolhapur(1) India/maha/nashik(1) I tried it by using facet.contains but it is not working so plz give solution for this issue --

Re: Problem in facet.contains

2015-07-04 Thread Erick Erickson
45 AM, Pritam Kute wrote: > Thanks Eric for your kind help. > > The field I am using is of string type and I tried escaping also, but still > facet.contains doesn't work for it. > > As you said facet.contains is expensive, I tried facet.prefix in place and > it is

Re: Problem in facet.contains

2015-07-04 Thread Pritam Kute
Thanks Eric for your kind help. The field I am using is of string type and I tried escaping also, but still facet.contains doesn't work for it. As you said facet.contains is expensive, I tried facet.prefix in place and it is working fine for my requirement. Thanks again. Thanks &

Re: Problem in facet.contains

2015-07-03 Thread Erick Erickson
g solr 5.2.0 setup. I am trying to create > multiple types of facets on same field. I am filtering the facets by using " > *facet.contains*". The following is the data into field. > > roles : { > "0/Student Name/", > "1/Student Name/1000/", >

Problem in facet.contains

2015-07-02 Thread Pritam Kute
Hello All, I am new user to solr and using solr 5.2.0 setup. I am trying to create multiple types of facets on same field. I am filtering the facets by using " *facet.contains*". The following is the data into field. roles : { "0/Student Name/", "1/Student Na

facet.contains

2015-01-06 Thread Will Butler
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1387 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1387> contains a patch to support facet.contains and facet.contains.ignoreCase, making it possible to easily filter facet results without the facet.prefix limitations. I know that it is possi