Re: facet should add facet.analyzer

2007-05-28 Thread James liu
2007/5/29, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: : > facet.analyzer is true, do analyze, if false don't analyze. : What if Solr doesn't have access to the unindexed version? My : suggestion would be to copyField into an unanalyzed version, and : facet on that. me too. yeah, i'm not even su

Re: facet should add facet.analyzer

2007-05-28 Thread Chris Hostetter
: > facet.analyzer is true, do analyze, if false don't analyze. : What if Solr doesn't have access to the unindexed version? My : suggestion would be to copyField into an unanalyzed version, and : facet on that. yeah, i'm not even sure that i understand the orriginal suggestion clearly (i'd nee

Re: facet should add facet.analyzer

2007-05-28 Thread Mike Klaas
On 25-May-07, at 9:46 PM, James liu wrote: facet.analyzer is true, do analyze, if false don't analyze. why i say that, Chinese word not use space to split, so if analyzed, it will change. now i will use map to fix it before no facet.analyzer. What if Solr doesn't have access to the unind

facet should add facet.analyzer

2007-05-25 Thread James liu
facet.analyzer is true, do analyze, if false don't analyze. why i say that, Chinese word not use space to split, so if analyzed, it will change. now i will use map to fix it before no facet.analyzer. -- regards jl