gt; On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Fuad Efendi wrote:
>> It seems BOBO-Browse is alternate faceting engine; would be interesting to
>> compare performance with SOLR... Distributed?
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jason Rutherglen [mailto:jason.rutherg.
h SOLR... Distributed?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Rutherglen [mailto:jason.rutherg...@gmail.com]
> Sent: August-12-09 6:12 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: facet performance tips
>
> For your fields with many terms you may want to
uld be interesting to
> compare performance with SOLR... Distributed?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Rutherglen [mailto:jason.rutherg...@gmail.com]
> Sent: August-12-09 6:12 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: facet performance tips
>
> For
Interesting, it has "BoboRequestHandler implements SolrRequestHandler"
- easy to try it; and shards support
[Fuad Efendi] It seems BOBO-Browse is alternate faceting engine; would be
interesting to
compare performance with SOLR... Distributed?
[Jason Rutherglen] For your fields with many terms
performance tips
For your fields with many terms you may want to try Bobo
http://code.google.com/p/bobo-browse/ which could work well with your
case.
vé [mailto:jerome.et...@gmail.com]
Sent: August-13-09 5:38 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: facet performance tips
Thanks everyone for your advices.
I increased my filterCache, and the faceting performances improved greatly.
My faceted field can have at the moment ~4 different t
Thanks everyone for your advices.
I increased my filterCache, and the faceting performances improved greatly.
My faceted field can have at the moment ~4 different terms, so I
did set a filterCache size of 5 and it works very well.
However, I'm planning to increase the number of terms to
Note that depending on the profile of your field (full text and how many
unique terms on average per document), the improvements from 1.4 may not
apply, as you may exceed the limits of the new faceting technique in Solr
1.4.
-Stephen
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> Yes, in
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:ehatc...@apache.org]
> Sent: August-12-09 2:12 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: facet performance tips
>
> Yes, increasing the filterCache size will help with Solr 1.3
> performance.
al Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:ehatc...@apache.org]
Sent: August-12-09 2:12 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: facet performance tips
Yes, increasing the filterCache size will help with Solr 1.3
performance.
Do note that trunk (soon Solr 1.4) has dramatically improved fac
Yes, increasing the filterCache size will help with Solr 1.3
performance.
Do note that trunk (soon Solr 1.4) has dramatically improved faceting
performance.
Erik
On Aug 12, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Jérôme Etévé wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm using some faceting on a solr index containing ~ 1
-Original Message-
From: Jérôme Etévé [mailto:jerome.et...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 12:31 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: facet performance tips
Hi everyone,
I'm using some faceting on a solr index containing ~ 160K documents.
I perform facets on multivalued s
Hi everyone,
I'm using some faceting on a solr index containing ~ 160K documents.
I perform facets on multivalued string fields. The number of possible
different values is quite large.
Enabling facets degrades the performance by a factor 3.
Because I'm using solr 1.3, I guess the facetting mak
13 matches
Mail list logo
