Additionally, I should have mentioned that you can instead do:
fq=field_3:[* TO *], which uses the filtercache.
The method presented by Chris will probably outperform the above method but
only on the first request, from then on the filtercache takes over.
>From a performance standpoint it's probab
nice one! thanks.
>
>> i could be wrong but it seems this
>> way has a performance hit?
>>
>> or i am missing something?
>
> Did you read Chris's message in http://search-lucene.com/m/1o5mEk8DjX1/
> He proposes alternative (more efficient) way other than [* TO *]
>
>
>
>
> i could be wrong but it seems this
> way has a performance hit?
>
> or i am missing something?
Did you read Chris's message in http://search-lucene.com/m/1o5mEk8DjX1/
He proposes alternative (more efficient) way other than [* TO *]
i could be wrong but it seems this way has a performance hit?
or i am missing something?
> field1:"new york"+field2:"new york"+field3:[* TO *]
>
> 2010/6/4 bluestar
>
>> hi there,
>>
>> say my search query is "new york", and i am searching field1 and field2
>> for it, how do i specify that i wan
field1:"new york"+field2:"new york"+field3:[* TO *]
2010/6/4 bluestar
> hi there,
>
> say my search query is "new york", and i am searching field1 and field2
> for it, how do i specify that i want to exlude docs where field3 doesnt
> exist?
>
> thanks
>
>
> say my search query is "new york", and i am searching
> field1 and field2
> for it, how do i specify that i want to exlude docs where
> field3 doesnt
> exist?
http://search-lucene.com/m/1o5mEk8DjX1/
hi there,
say my search query is "new york", and i am searching field1 and field2
for it, how do i specify that i want to exlude docs where field3 doesnt
exist?
thanks
