t it would be :-(
>
> I.E., the suffix (or prefix if you set it up that way,) will NOT be dropped.
> I was hoping that everything except the globbing character, '*', would just
> be a flag to the query processor and disappear after being 'noticed'.
>
> Not
uary 7, 2011 3:28:18 PM
Subject: Re: dynamic fields revisited
It would be quite annoying if it behaves as you were hoping for. This way it
is possible to use different field types (and analyzers) for the same field
value. In faceting, for example, this can be important because you should use
a
It would be quite annoying if it behaves as you were hoping for. This way it
is possible to use different field types (and analyzers) for the same field
value. In faceting, for example, this can be important because you should use
analyzed fields for q and fq but unanalyzed fields for facet.fiel
r being 'noticed'.
Not so :-)
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/dynamic-fields-revisited-tp2161080p2447814.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
rself.
from 'http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4501&tag=nl.e036'
EARTH has a Right To Life,
otherwise we all die.
- Original Message
From: Lance Norskog
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thu, December 30, 2010 4:26:58 PM
Subject: Re: dynamic fields re
solr/admin/analysis.jsp uses the Luke handler. You can browse facets and fields.
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>> If I understand you correctly, for an INT dynamic field
>> called *_int2
>> filled with field callled my_number_int2 during data
>> import
>> in a query, I will
> If I understand you correctly, for an INT dynamic field
> called *_int2
> filled with field callled my_number_int2 during data
> import
> in a query, I will search in the index on the field
> called:
> "my_number_int2"
>
> correct?
>
Exactly.
Using http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LukeRequestHa
- Original Message
From: Lance Norskog
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wed, December 29, 2010 6:11:32 PM
Subject: Re: dynamic fields revisited
>>> B/ Is the search done on the dynamic filed name in the schema, or on the
>name
>> that was matched?
>The d
>A/ How much room in the index do 'non used' dynamic fields add per record, any?
If you use field norms or document boosts in that field, there is a
one-byte array[# of documents]. Otherwise there is no space used.
> B/ Is the search done on the dynamic filed name in the schema, or on the name
>
Well, getting close to the time when the 'rubber meets the road'.
A couple of questions about dynamic fields.
A/ How much room in the index do 'non used' dynamic fields add per record,
any?
B/ Is the search done on the dynamic filed name in the schema, or on the name
that was matched?
C/
10 matches
Mail list logo
