he other huge and not so often
> updated index. But i didn't find any possibilities to combine these two
> indices in one query. Is that even possible?
>
>
> Does somebody have experience with these topics or give advice how to solve
> that case properly?
> Thanks in advance.
What Ken describes is called 'role-based' security. Users have roles,
and security items talk about roles, not users.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Role-based_access_control
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Peter Sturge wrote:
> Yes, you don't want to hard code permissions into your index - it wil
Yes, you don't want to hard code permissions into your index - it will give
you headaches.
You might want to have a look at SOLR 1872:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1872 .
This patch provides doc level security through an external ACL mechanism (in
this case, an XML file) controlling
On Jul 6, 2010, at 8:27am, osocurious2 wrote:
Someone else was recently asking a similar question (or maybe it was
you but
worded differently :) ).
Putting user level security at a document level seems like a recipe
for
pain. Solr/Lucene don't do frequent update well...and being highly
lid roles, then FilterQuery on role.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/document-level-security-indexing-searching-techniques-tp946528p946649.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
#x27;t find any possibilities to combine these two
indices in one query. Is that even possible?
Does somebody have experience with these topics or give advice how to solve
that case properly?
Thanks in advance.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/document-level-se
