Re: distrib=false

2014-12-28 Thread Shawn Heisey
et all query of type *:* to test . > > The behavior I notice is that even though when a particular replica of a > shard is queried using distrib=false , the request goes to the other > replica of the same shard. Attachments almost never make it through the mailing list processing. The s

Re: distrib=false

2014-12-28 Thread S.L
notice is that even though when a particular replica of a shard is queried using distrib=false , the request goes to the other replica of the same shard. Thanks. On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > How are you sending the request? AFAIK, setting distrib=false > should shoul

Re: distrib=false

2014-12-27 Thread Erick Erickson
How are you sending the request? AFAIK, setting distrib=false should should keep the query from being sent to any other node, although I'm not quite sure what happens when you host multiple replicas of the _same_ shard on the same node. So we need: 1> your topology, How many nodes

distrib=false

2014-12-27 Thread S.L
Hi All, I have a question regarding distrib=false on the Solr query , it seems that the distribution is restricted across only the shards when the parameter is set to false, meaning if I query a particular node with in a shard with replication factor of more than one , the request could go to

Re: distrib=false is not honoring

2014-05-16 Thread Aman Tandon
nt in both the shard at node1:8983 and node2:1983 To figure this out i indexed it with the another different doc now when i queried with http://localhost:8983/solr/mcats/select?q.alt=id:17406780&distrib=false<http://localhost:8983/solr/mcats/select?q.alt=id:174060&shards=localhost:8983/sol

Re: distrib=false is not honoring

2014-05-16 Thread Shawn Heisey
> The q.alt param specifies only the parameter to use if the q parameter is > missing. Could you verify whether that is really the case? Typically > solrconfig gives a default of "*:*" for the q parameter. Specifying a > query > via the q.alt parameter seems like a strange approach - what is your >

Re: distrib=false is not honoring

2014-05-16 Thread Aman Tandon
is difference in the total count of docs, please see these logs query: A) *localhost:1983* *871949 [qtp27058272-19] INFO org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore – [mcats] webapp=/solr path=/select params={mm=%0a%09%0a2<-1+4<70%25%0a+&facet=true&tie=0.01&qf=%0a%09namex%0a++++

Re: distrib=false is not honoring

2014-05-14 Thread Aman Tandon
t; > With both the server i make the copy of example directory as mentioned in > wiki, and queried over the both nodes > > *query 1*: > http://localhost:8983/solr/mcats/select?q.alt=id:69763&distrib=false&qt=mcat.intent > *query 2*: > http://localhost:1983/solr/mcats/

distrib=false is not honoring

2014-05-14 Thread Aman Tandon
mentioned in wiki, and queried over the both nodes *query 1*: http://localhost:8983/solr/mcats/select?q.alt=id:69763&distrib=false&qt=mcat.intent *query 2*: http://localhost:1983/solr/mcats/select?q.alt=id:69763&distrib=false&qt=mcat.intent total number of docs count become half but i sea

Re: distrib=false is not honoring

2014-05-14 Thread Jack Krupansky
at is your rationale? What is this odd "mcat.intent" query response writer type that you are specifying with the qt parameter? -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Aman Tandon Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 1:35 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: distrib=false i

Re: Question on distrib=false

2013-05-31 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar
> > Maseter Slave 1 > |_ Slave 2 > > we indexed few records in slave1 and few records in slave2, while querying > we need data only from slave 1. > So used below query > > http://xxx.com/solr/select?q=*:*&shards=slave1,slave2&distrib=false &g

Question on distrib=false

2013-05-31 Thread sathish_ix
Hi, We have following setup , Maseter Slave 1 |_ Slave 2 we indexed few records in slave1 and few records in slave2, while querying we need data only from slave 1. So used below query http://xxx.com/solr/select?q=*:*&shards=slave1,slave2&distrib=false