On Feb 8, 2007, at 11:55 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 2/8/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Assuming there is an fq=xxx in the query, could dismax support a
queryless query?
It does seem reasonable for both dismax and the standard request
hander, esp since we have faceting in the mi
i'm switching from standard to dismax and ran into this.
I'll post a little patch in a sec.
ryan
On 2/8/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/8/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Assuming there is an fq=xxx in the query, could dismax support a
> queryless query?
It does seem reasonable for both dismax and the standard request
hander, esp since we have faceting in the
On 2/8/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Assuming there is an fq=xxx in the query, could dismax support a
queryless query?
It does seem reasonable for both dismax and the standard request
hander, esp since we have faceting in the mix (asking for facet
constraints without supplying a
Assuming there is an fq=xxx in the query, could dismax support a
queryless query?
I know it may not seem too meaningfully, but it would be nice to use
the same handler / query for:
?fq=type:file&ft=published=true
?fq=type:file&ft=published=true&q=ryan
?fq=type:file&ft=published=true&q=
Even
